Search for: "STATE v GIANT"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,999
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2014, 4:48 pm
Here’s a potential Giant of a lawsuit. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 4:35 am
In Murray v. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 4:39 pm
Chatterjee v CBS, 6:19-CV-212-REW United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 12:46 pm
In a major victory for marijuana rights in California, the state supreme court has declined to hear an appeal from prosecutors on the overturned conviction of a marijuana collective operator in People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 7:49 am
The search giant says Vista hinders the use of its desktop-search service. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:14 am
The Internet giants aren’t state actors. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 2:54 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act, termination of parental rights) * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2014dct.htmlCases featured: Smith v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm
Pharmaceutical companies will need to carefully study and consider how to react to “groundbreaking” business practice reforms global health care giant GlaxoSmithKline LLC (“GSK”) has agreed to implement as part of the record $3 billion criminal and civil agreement resolving federal health care fraud and drug marketing charges following its July 2, 2012 guilty plea in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm
Pharmaceutical companies will need to carefully study and consider how to react to “groundbreaking” business practice reforms global health care giant GlaxoSmithKline LLC (“GSK”) has agreed to implement as part of the record $3 billion criminal and civil agreement resolving federal health care fraud and drug marketing charges following its July 2, 2012 guilty plea in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm
Pharmaceutical companies will need to carefully study and consider how to react to “groundbreaking” business practice reforms global health care giant GlaxoSmithKline LLC (“GSK”) has agreed to implement as part of the record $3 billion criminal and civil agreement resolving federal health care fraud and drug marketing charges following its July 2, 2012 guilty plea in U.S. v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:48 am
But the case brings the most direct legal challenge in the United States to the clout that Apple has built up through its App Store. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Published reports citing court filings stated that company executives met with the mediator in a full-day session, followed by a number of phone calls, without success. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Go Giants. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 3:01 pm
Today the nation lost a legal giant. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:01 pm
” The case is Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
On Dec. 11, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia heard arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 6:46 am
At Concurring Opinions, Alan Chen considers whether the Roberts Court has a “First Amendment agenda,” in light of its decisions to grant cert. in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:09 am
The United States Supreme Court has moved a giant leap forward in LGBTQ+ rights with the latest opinion in Bostock v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 2:00 am
The gist of the matter is that Google will introduce a notice-and-take-down procedure in response to the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union this March in the Google AdWords case, Joined Cases C-236, 237 and 238/08 Google France, Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier; Google France v Viaticum Luteciel; Google France v CNRRH Pierre? [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:35 pm
Salon FAD v. [read post]
