Search for: "STATE v SCHWARZ" Results 81 - 100 of 100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2009, 5:00 am
This post is . . . whatever comes after the umpteenth.In Copley v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:14 am
Supreme Court rejected this kind of "end run" in the IPO Laddering Antitrust Case (Credit Suisse v. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 2:44 am
Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:16 am
FellerNASSAU COUNTYBusiness LawForeign Corporation Not 'Mere' Out-of-State Distributor, Business Activities Not 'Occasional'Schwarz Supply Source v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
You can separately subscribe to the Pharma & Biotech edition of the IP Thinktank Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘Pharma, Biotech & Chem’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Mircera (Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) - US: Trial judge grants permanent injunction in case relating to recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) patent: Amgen… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 2:36 pm
It stated that the essential characteristic of remuneration lies in the fact that it constitutes consideration for the service in question (see, inter alia, Case 263/86 Humbel, paragraph 17; Case C-422/01 Skandia and Ramstedt, paragraph 23; Case C-76/05 Schwarz and Gootjes-Schwarz, paragraph 38; and Case C-318/05 Commission v Germany, paragraph 67). [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 9:20 am
Justice Antonin Scalia had pressed Schwarz on whether a state law that gave the political parties freedom to choose any method they wanted to select their judicial nominees would violate the Constitution. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:09 am
., the Court is scheduled to hear arguments in New York State Board of Elections, et al. v. [read post]