Search for: "STATE v. FAVOR" Results 81 - 100 of 37,121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 5:58 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  FDA’s rejection of all RWD supporting GED in favor of randomized controlled trials cannot be squared with its broader policies. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:40 am by Taylor Johnson
The Iowa Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in favor of the argument presented by Payton and Taylor. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am by Eric Goldman
As a result, judges have provided two landmark opinions in the last 45 days in favor of web scrapers. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In addition, a Satisfaction of Judgment was filed on February 24,2021 stating that the Judgment was paid in full and the sum of $0.00 remains unpaid (NYSCEF Doc. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
A “real and substantial interest” standard sounds rather favorable for an unnamed shareholder hoping to intervene in a derivative suit. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am by Stuart Kaplow
Last year, the state court ruled in favor of the 16 youth plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am by Russell Knight
This money judgment, however, only states that a party must pay a particular sum. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Pliva, Inc. v Mensing (564 U.S. 604 [2011]), the Supreme Court found that these plaintiffs’ state-law claims against generic manufacturers were preempted by federal law under the Supremacy Clause to the extent that state-law failure-to-warn statutes required generic drugs to provide more stringent, safer warning labels. [read post]