Search for: "STATE v. FOGEL"
Results 81 - 100
of 129
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2010, 11:22 am
Judge Jeremy Fogel agreed and stated: The USEPA has exclusive authority to approve remedial action plans when a risk-based cleanup of PCB’s is elected. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 11:06 pm
Dancy v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:20 am
More on the Supreme Court's 2008 ruling in Baze v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:49 pm
FTC v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:53 pm
Judge Jeremy Fogel denied the petition for habeas corpus stating that Mr. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:59 pm
Upon receiving the case, Judge Jeremy Fogel did just that. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:32 am
Judge William Alsup stated the United States Supreme Court 'has not yet made a clear ruling that admission of irrelevant or overtly prejudicial evidence constitutes a due process violation sufficient to warrant issuance of the writ.' Holley v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:07 pm
Fogel said that Brown could request that the state use a single drug (sodium thiopental) for the execution, but Brown refused to make a choice. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:34 am
I noted here that I did not think Judge Fogel's "choice" order was valid. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:37 pm
Brown can not prove that he will suffer pain if he is executed under the current regulations," Adams said.Meanwhile, on the other end of the Golden Gate, the following order has been entered in the Ninth Circuit case on appeal from Judge Fogel's denial of a stay (noted here), Morales v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:29 am
[Post by Venkat, with additional comments by Eric] Facebook v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
"San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 10:14 pm
United States District Court Judge Jeremy Fogel (Northern District of California) denied a motion to stay that was predicated upon the Supreme Court's decision to grant certiorari in Concepcion. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 1:49 pm
Tietsworth v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:40 am
The reasons were stated at a hearing but not in the order.) [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:15 pm
So long as an illegal sentence is subject to correction, a defendant cannot claim a legitimate expectation that the originally-imposed, improper sentence is final for all purposes (see United States v Fogel, 829 F2d 77, 87 [DC Cir 1987])...Yet, there must be a temporal limitation on a court's ability to resentence a defendant (see generally DeWitt v Ventetoulo, 6 F3d at 34-35) since criminal courts do not have perpetual jurisdiction over all persons who were… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:00 am
In The Levin Group, PC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:26 pm
There is not a lot of precedent in this area (but see one of our favorites, Online Policy Group v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:04 pm
See, e.g., Lewis v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 10:01 pm
Fogel cannot do more.In re Accutane Prods. [read post]
