Search for: "STATE v. MARQUES"
Results 81 - 100
of 170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2016, 3:44 pm
Procedural fairness and the Penalties Regulation: R(Roche) v Secretary of State for HealthEibhlin Vardy brings us the second report covering the recent Monckton Chambers' seminar. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:51 am
Guido Kucsko also cautioned that OTK v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 3:23 am
Marques and Byron Shaw (2012). [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:08 am
Well, it was the day of the Advocate General's Opinion in Case C-46/10 Viking Gas A/S v BP Gas A/S, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret (Denmark), lodged on 28 January 2010. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:06 pm
Likewise there is an almost obsessive interest in patent litigation in the United States, where the subject lies somewhere between a cottage industry and an art form, with ever-shifting guidance concerning injunctions, damages, patent eligibility and the interrelationship of patent suits with the sale price of patents singly or in bundles. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:10 am
On that very day, IPKat blogmeister Jeremy happened to alight upon the MARQUES Conference in Vienna, where some 820 trade mark experts -- mainly from Europe -- assembled. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
There again, the peculiarly interesting state of trade mark law in the United Kingdom and, not far beyond it, in the territory of the European Economic Area, might be closer to the cause. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm
Some other Member States, including France and Belgium, have laws which restrict – usually to non-commercial purposes – the use of such images without prior authorisation. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:09 am
Co. v Horde (259 Ga. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:15 am
Get-on-the-Web Ltd., D2001-0154 (WIPO April 20, 2001); Jet Marques v. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 9:08 pm
In Campbell v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am
In a press release, the Met stated that the arrests were for affray, public order offenses, breach of the peace and conspiracy to cause a public nuisance. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 4:21 pm
Perhaps a better analogue can be a found in that of a privateer, whose operations are sanctioned under a letter of marque granted by a sovereign state and thus what would otherwise be a pirate ship is rendered a legitimate agent of the sovereign, and thus engage in legal warfare which is not in violation of the law of nations.[9] However, the authority of the Westphalian sovereign to grant letters of marque is (at least de iure if not de facto) limited by the… [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:03 pm
However, today's decision in Case T-526/09 PAKI Logistics GmbH v OHIM; soutenu par Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord -- available only in French and German so far -- has drummed up a lot of activity in the general vicinity of the Kat's email in-box, spearheaded by the articulate and erudite Simon Malynicz (3 New Square) who appeared for the Royaume-Uni [Merpel explains: the United Kingdom has been rebranded 'Royaume-Uni' in a desperate… [read post]
15 May 2015, 5:39 am
Recent PatLit pieces review Unwired Planet v Huawei (FRAND and competition law issues held unsuitable for summary judgment) and the award of this year's Prix de thèse Véron & Associés. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
Stefano Barazza talks us through Medtronic v Mirowski in this PatLit post. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:03 am
For example, ECTA, INTA and MARQUES published a joint paper on the issue in July 2018. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 9:46 pm
Since different EU Member States appear to have different means of computing the five-year non-use period, this question is ripe for harmonisation. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
' presentation by Michael Geist on response to Bill C-61, growth of Fair Copyright for Canada and potential for different copyright reform choices (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) China 19th US-China Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade (IP Dragon) (Managing Intellectual Property) Chinese domain name scams (The Invent Blog) Pirate server operators busted in Jiangsu (China Hearsay) Europe European Brands Institute publishes 'Eurobrand 2008'… [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:54 am
Interestingly, the question the IPO asked its 'Interests' (in order to advise HMG how it should respond) was different to the question posed by the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ):Whether customs authorities should detain goods bearing a Community trade mark that are in transit through the EU from a non-Member State to another non-Member State, in the absence of evidence that they will be diverted onto the market in Member States. [read post]
