Search for: "STATE v. SETTLE II"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,096
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2019, 7:01 pm
Melanie Berzas v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:04 pm
Keith Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
II, § 1, cl. 5). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
II, § 1, cl. 5). [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 4:51 pm
Arkansas v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 This is not a housing case, but it is an important case on costs in settled claims for judicial review, which is a major issue for many housing practitioners. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 This is not a housing case, but it is an important case on costs in settled claims for judicial review, which is a major issue for many housing practitioners. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 10:38 am
PANTHER II TRANSPORTATION, INC., PANTHER EXPEDITED SERVICES, INC. and ANTHONY L. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am
(The case ultimately settled). [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Or consider the doctrine of state sovereign immunity, which the Court said in Alden v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:05 am
Doe v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
California State Lands Commission, et al (San Francisco Waterfront Partners II, LLC, et al) (1st Dist., Div. 4, 2015) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2015 WL 5450294. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
The judgment merely states thatcat conceptually confused “it is sufficient to recall that, according to settled case-law, the repute of a trade mark is relevant, in assessing the likelihood of confusion, only as regards the repute of the earlier mark”, citing Gitana v OHIM — Teddy (GITANA), T‑569/11 (2013) (para 98). [read post]
7 May 2013, 2:51 pm
In a Los Angeles case, Ingenuity 13 LLC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 6:33 am
Facebook stockholder Tri-State Pension Fund then filed a class action seeking to recoup the money Facebook spent defending and settling the reclassification. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:25 am
What they need more than anything else so they can even determine their preferred pace is (i) Judge Koh's ruling on the FTC's complaint (which the consumer class action is directly related to) and (ii) the Supreme Court's Apple v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:54 am
On August 7, 2015, in Dorain Cheeks v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 9:50 am
S. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:46 am
s ability to demonstrate that D.T.J. was well-settled in the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 2:11 pm
Earlier this year, on June 6, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Gallardo v. [read post]
