Search for: "STATE v. STRONG"
Results 81 - 100
of 16,335
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:59 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
26 May 2024, 5:23 am
International Court of Justice: South Africa v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
Shugerman, SEC v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
Bruen,” which instructed courts to look for analogous laws in history when considering the constitutionality of restrictions on the personal right to bear arms, “the state and the affected subdivisions have a strong likelihood of success in the pending litigation. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am
There are strong grounds for immediate action now to shield their faces. [read post]
23 May 2024, 11:21 am
Corbett v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:27 am
Regarding the politicization of climate policy and litigation, the general agreement among panelists was the need to emphasize strong democratic institutions as the basis for strong environmental law. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:01 am
Fisher v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am
As I explain below, there is actually a strong case for calling the October 7th attack genocide against a part of the Israeli people. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:20 am
., LLC v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
On April 23, 2024, the U.S. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
Shugerman, SEC v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am
Warrants would also provide the focal point for political and legal mobilization in third states, including the United States, making it harder to sustain military aid to Israel. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:26 am
The efficient markets hypothesis is over 50 years old.Basic v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been ratified so… [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm
Ever since, the MC99 provisions have been an integral part of the EU legal order (C-344/04 IATA and ELFAA, para. 36), save for the provisions on cargo, for which competence rests with the EU Member States. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:49 pm
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the CFPB's funding mechanism in its 7-2 decision in CFPB v. [read post]