Search for: "STEIN v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 81 - 100
of 105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
Commissioner, in an opinion that apparently confused four of the nine Justices,8 the Court limited the scope of the term “Departments” in the Appointments Clause to “executive divisions like the Cabinet-level departments. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:17 am
Breuer of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division announced today that attorney Mitchell J. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 2:50 am
In affirming Justice LaMarca's Order, the Appellate Division, Second Department, held that, "[t]he Supreme Court properly determined that the Stein defendants stated [**4] a cause of action against the third-party defendant Steven J. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:08 am
Supreme Court Justice Sunni Stromberg-Stein, in a recent decision in R. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 6:07 pm
Richland of Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland in Los Angeles. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:37 am
Buono: the cross at issue in that case has been removed, then replaced by a replica which was itself ordered removed by the Justice Department. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm
., v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:29 am
The case, Lawyers Funds for Client Protection v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:40 am
The law does not prohibit, "in an absolute sense, the matter decided by the arbitrator" and his decision does not so violate of "well-defined constitutional, statutory or common law" as to offend public policy.Justice Cardona, with Justice Stein concurring, dissented, stating that “The state's strong public policy against retaliatory personnel actions is expressed by the enactment of whistleblowers' statutes such as Civil Service Law… [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 4:57 am
The law does not prohibit, "in an absolute sense, the matter decided by the arbitrator" and his decision does not so violate of "well-defined constitutional, statutory or common law" as to offend public policy.Justice Cardona, with Justice Stein concurring, dissented, stating that "The state's strong public policy against retaliatory personnel actions is expressed by the enactment of whistleblowers' statutes such as Civil Service Law … [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:36 pm
The Justice Department declined to ask the Supreme Court to review the 2nd Circuit's ruling in U.S. v Stein. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 1:17 pm
The exclusionary rule case is Herring v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Whitley, No. 06-0131 In a criminal law matter, petition for review of decision denying rehearing is denied where the court declined to depart from the literal wording of the "except" clause of 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1)(A). . [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:10 pm
On August 28, 2008, the Department of Justice announced revisions to its controversial Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 3:52 pm
The Second Circuit has affirmed, in a 3-0 decision, Judge Kaplan's dismissal of criminal indictments against 13 KPMG employees on the grounds that the Justice Department violated their right to counsel. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:51 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 2:44 pm
” Further, the court pointed to the fact that “[t]he Justice Department itself undoubtedly recognized this when, following Stein I, it changed it in the McNulty Memorandum. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:18 pm
In this podcast, David Shapiro, of counsel with Pepper Hamilton and former trial attorney of the Department of Justice, discusses the impact of the July 16, 2007 dismissal of former KPMG employees from a government fraud case pending in the Southern District of New York. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
Stein. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 1:27 am
Jeffrey Stein et al. [read post]
