Search for: "STEVENS v. ROGERS"
Results 81 - 100
of 322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2008, 9:31 am
They oppose what they regard as liberal judicial activism (e.g., Roe v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:36 pm
” Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the majority in Wednesday’s decision, Wyeth v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
The first is Murphy v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
” A scholars' brief on "the History and Original Meaning of the Fourth Amendment as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner in Carpenter v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 1:35 am
Feb 05, 2008) (NO. 2693, 2039/05)Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:15 am
Cole will replace Steven R. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:21 am
Reggie Rogers, Defendant-Appellant.2010 WL 773273, 2010 N.Y. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am
United States, in which the Court will consider Congress’s ability to expand its powers via a treaty; participants include Judge Alex Kozinski, Nicholas Quinn Rosencrantz, and Roger Pilon. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
Other commentary on the case comes from Roger Pilon at Cato at Liberty, Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Andrew Suszek at more than twenty cents, and Bill Blum at truthdig. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:59 pm
(Roger Bamber / Alamy)ONE TIME USE ONLY – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION An interesting new article, Steven J. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 8:04 pm
In order to get five votes, Justices Kennedy and Stevens almost certainly flipped over the the liberal side. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 2:27 pm
At Prometheus, Roger Pielke Jr. has this post on the decision, which points to a scientific error in Justice Stevens's opinion (via Volokh Conspiracy). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm
Stevens, another case we cheered. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Freedman v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Murphy v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:17 am
At Salon, Alex Seitz-Wald reports on remarks by retired Justice John Paul Stevens, who told an audience last night that the rationale behind the Court’s decision in Bush v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:51 am
Rumsfeld, Rumsfeld v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 1:43 am
Roger Reid, Defendant-Appellant.--- N.Y.S.2d ----, (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. [read post]
20 May 2008, 9:14 am
Steven G. [read post]
