Search for: "STONE v. HOLDER"
Results 81 - 100
of 182
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
” In The Hill, David Cole, who represented the Humanitarian Law Project in Holder v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Bork v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 11:30 am
See American Legion v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 7:17 am
Although such advertisements use trademarked terms in commerce and are geared toward increasing the ad buyer’s business at the trademark holder’s expense, they do not implicate the Lanham Act because they draw a clear distinction between the products and do not imply the trademark holder’s sponsorship or approval. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:04 am
Thoms was even a native title holder. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 8:37 pm
Cadman, R. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:14 am
Govt. launches massive operation to seize internet websites that are allegedly violating IPR laws (Spicy IP) (PlagiarismToday) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google – Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Frederick (2007) and Holder v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 10:35 pm
Apple must be very afraid of jurisdictions like Germany that it thinks it can get a better deal in the Eastern District of Texas.What makes Apple's newfound love of the Eastern District of Texas--a district that has a hard-earned reputation for being sympathetic to patent holders--look like hell freezing over is that Apple is normally so very afraid of being sued there that--in order to have a stronger position to deny having much of a connection with that district--Apple even closed… [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Young, 13-95, yet another state-on-top habeas case (this time from the Second Circuit), concerns a whole slew of habeas fun, but in the main asks whether the state can forfeit application of the old rule from Stone v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:08 pm
Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:34 am
Prince (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Abercrombie & Fitch – A&F sues in Seattle for cybersquatting and unfair competition (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Google – Trademark law doesn’t allow companies to silence competitors – Public Knowledge amicus brief in Rosetta Stone v Google (Public Knowledge) [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am
Those pesky TurtlesIt seems SiriusXM has decided to rely on the 1940 case of RCA v Whiteman et al to persuade U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Stone (Univ. of Chicago Law School) Rebecca Tushnet (Georgetown Univ. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 2:35 pm
The opinion should therefore be good news for those who support Google’s defense of keyword advertising against trademark claims in such cases as Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
In a recent case this month, Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
Mo. 2008) (citing In re Stone, 166 B.R. 621, 623 (Bankr. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:23 am
Wheeler, 254 U.S. 281, 293 (1920); Saenz v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:02 am
King (C, Am, F, G) “Beast of Burden” by The Rolling Stones (B, E, F#, E Keep in mind that the chords and keys might vary between these examples, but they all share the same I-IV-V-IV progression structure. [read post]
