Search for: "STONE v. HOLDER"
Results 81 - 100
of 182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2015, 4:04 am
Eventually, in Stone v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
He further points out that inanimate right-holders have now been created such as corporations. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 1:52 am
Sang Stone Hamoon Jonoub Co Ltd v Baoyue Shipping Co Ltd (“The Bao Yue”) [2015] EWHC 2288 (Comm) The dispute related to a cargo of iron ore carried from Iran to China by the Defendant Shipper. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 1:52 am
Sang Stone Hamoon Jonoub Co Ltd v Baoyue Shipping Co Ltd (“The Bao Yue”) [2015] EWHC 2288 (Comm) The dispute related to a cargo of iron ore carried from Iran to China by the Defendant Shipper. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 7:17 am
Although such advertisements use trademarked terms in commerce and are geared toward increasing the ad buyer’s business at the trademark holder’s expense, they do not implicate the Lanham Act because they draw a clear distinction between the products and do not imply the trademark holder’s sponsorship or approval. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Stone (Univ. of Chicago Law School) Rebecca Tushnet (Georgetown Univ. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
For instance: when does the alteration of objects incorporating the protected work involve a new authorisation from the right holder? [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:29 am
Texas) in CM Paula Company v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:44 am
The Appellants assert that the House of Lords decision in Stone and Rolls Ltd v Moore Stephens [1] (in which the liquidators of Stone and Rolls were unable to pursue a claim against the company’s auditors for failure to detect a fraud perpetrated by Stone and Rolls’ sole director and shareholder) applies to the facts in this case thereby preventing Bilta (itself now in liquidation) from making any claim. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court recently granted review in Walker v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am
Those pesky TurtlesIt seems SiriusXM has decided to rely on the 1940 case of RCA v Whiteman et al to persuade U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:51 am
Unfortunately, some of the people shaping Europe's patent policy are now pushing for a Stone Age approach that makes patent injunctions a given in any case in which an infringement is identified, more than eight years after the eBay v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
Mo. 2008) (citing In re Stone, 166 B.R. 621, 623 (Bankr. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
The Data Protection Act: a stone to sling at the Facebook Goliath? – Rhory Robertson and Sophie Pugh
28 Jul 2014, 5:10 pm
Manipulating the emotions of its account holders may be unethical but is Facebook contravening any laws? [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 9:19 pm
The IPKat round-ups, starting today, are the classical two-birds-and-one-stone solution. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:22 am
Where a passing off case is equivalent to a trade mark case, the rights holder may be entitled to all profits earned on the ground that the distinguishing mark enables all of the sales. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
David gave examples from Kohler Mira v Bristan Group [2013] EWPCC 2, Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC 1882 and Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWCA Civ 1339 where dotted lines were held to indicate transparency. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 8:24 am
Back in 2005 Millen designed and placed on sale in Ireland a striped shirt (in blue and a stone brown versions) and a black knit top. [read post]
