Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 81 - 100
of 6,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Travis Laster held in Palkon v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:26 am
In a pre-trial conference on January 19, 2024 Judge Stein said the fair use of the photographs was a mixed question of law and fact, and one that would not easily be decided using the fair use test.[27] Graham and McNatt’s trials had been scheduled to start in February.[28] Two judgments filed in New York awarded damages to Graham and McNatt in the amount of five times the sales price of Prince’s “New Portraits” works produced from… [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
A restriction on the sale of the property will be deemed void and not apply to the recipient’s property interest. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:38 am
If the CVD approach isn't working, maybe it's worth giving something else a try. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:38 am
If the CVD approach isn't working, maybe it's worth giving something else a try. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 8:59 am
This was true until February 21, 2024, when the Appellate Division released the unreported (non-precedential) decision in Geary v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm
Increasingly seeing competitors using SAD scheme to knock them out during peak sales periods. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
World Champ Tech LLC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 1:29 pm
She cites ElliottEstate v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 8:00 am
Candace C. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm
This manipulation led to the outright confiscation and sale of Grünbaum’s entire art collection, with the proceeds benefiting the Nazi Party. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
” A press release accompanying the bill’s introduction stated that Congressman Pallone introduced the bill “to protect consumers from the bombardment of dangerous and unwanted calls and texts that have been exacerbated by the Supreme Court’s decision in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
Further, the Court stated that it is an established principle of settled case-law that, as a general rule, the submission of facts and evidence by the parties remains possible after the expiry of the relevant time limits, and the EUIPO is not prohibited from taking account of such facts and evidence (mobile.de v EUIPO, C‑418/16 P).In this case, it was accepted by both parties that Mr Noah had submitted the first evidence of use of the Mark within the time limit set by… [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm
Decided: September 29, 2021BEFORE JULIO C. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
If you’re interested, good places to start are Part II-C of the Baude/Paulsen article, and Part I-E of Kim Roosevelt’s amicus brief. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 3:17 pm
The measure of a member’s voting power (LLCL 402[a]), profit and loss share (LLCL 503), share of distributions (LLCL 504), and share of net assets distributed upon dissolution (LLCL 704[c]) all are based on the proportionate “value” of each member’s “contributions” which in theory may vary over time. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
There’s also resonance with the defense of overreaching C&D letters—“we have to protect our trademark! [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
Hanover Star v. [read post]
