Search for: "Samuels v. District of Columbia" Results 81 - 100 of 281
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Coleman Saunders
District Court for the District of Columbia determined that the defendants were not entitled to sovereign immunity and rejected their motion to dismiss, though it granted their motion for interlocutory appeal in 2017. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 12:48 pm by justia
You can see how it works by listening to and reading the arguments in the recent handgun case District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am by Mark Walsh
Jordan Lorence of the Alliance Defending Freedom is here, likely awaiting the decision in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:07 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, for instance, government agencies typically prevail. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am by Amy Howe
  It heard oral arguments for the second time in Johnson v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 11:18 am by Robert Percival
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that Section 107(a) cost-recovery actions and Section 113(f)(3)(B) contribution actions are mutually exclusive. [read post]
21 May 2018, 2:16 pm by Andrew Hamm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit applied the standard for Section 1983 claims by prisoners that Friendly had articulated in Johnson v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm by Mark Walsh
” He noted that 41 states, two U.S. territories, and the District of Columbia had joined an amicus brief on South Dakota’s side asking the court to reject the Quill test. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 1:57 pm by Andrew Hamm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected these claims on the ground that the Constitution’s speech-or-debate clause prohibits judicial review of legislative actions such as voting. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:30 pm by Theresa Inacker
These are New York, New Jersey, California, Hawaii, Maryland, and arguably, the District of Columbia, which restrict or ban the carrying of firearms in public. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 11:28 am by Amy Howe
In a concurring opinion, Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined the majority in concluding that the case should go back to the lower court, but he also indicated that he shared the concern – expressed by Justice Samuel Alito in his dissenting opinion – that the lower courts “may not be properly applying” the Supreme Court’s most recent gun rights rulings, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Adam Feldman
Abbasi, the most-cited recent decision, appeared in Alito’s majority opinion in Jennings, Thomas’ majority opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]