Search for: "San Jose California Supreme Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 659
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2021, 4:44 pm
City of San Jose (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 1325, 1345 [my 11/12/13 post on which can be found here]; Clews Land & Livestock, LLC v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
The case names of the newest decisions start with Section 3 and are denoted by bold italic fonts. 2020 CEQA UPDATE To read the 2020 cumulative CEQA review, click here: https://blog.aklandlaw.com/2021/01/articles/ceqa/2020-ceqa-4th-quarter-review/ CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There is 1 CEQA case pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
The case names of the newest decisions start with Section 3 and are denoted by bold italic fonts. 2020 CEQA UPDATE To read the 2020 cumulative CEQA review, click here: https://blog.aklandlaw.com/2021/01/articles/ceqa/2020-ceqa-4th-quarter-review/ CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There is 1 CEQA case pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court has signaled its willingness to limit disease mitigation in the name of religious freedom. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 12:10 pm
Lie, as Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District (San Jose)Judge Charles E. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 1:44 pm
Supreme Court and for the Honorable William A. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 6:00 am
San Francisco and San Jose both increased their sales taxes by 0.125 percentage points (to 8.625 and 9.375 percent, respectively) as a result of voter-approved measures, while many other jurisdictions in the area—including the counties of Alameda, San Mateo, and Santa Clara—likewise saw increases.[6] Sales taxes rose elsewhere in the state, including in West Hollywood, where voters approved an increase from 9.5 to 10.25 percent, which went into effect… [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
The case names of the newest decisions start with Section 3 and are denoted by bold italic fonts. 2020 CEQA UPDATE To read the 2020 cumulative CEQA review, click here: https://blog.aklandlaw.com/2021/01/articles/ceqa/2020-ceqa-4th-quarter-review/ CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There is 1 CEQA case pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
The case names of the newest decisions start with Section 3 and are denoted by bold italic fonts. 2020 CEQA UPDATE To read the 2020 cumulative CEQA review, click here: https://blog.aklandlaw.com/2021/01/articles/ceqa/2020-ceqa-4th-quarter-review/ CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There is 1 CEQA case pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 8:52 am
City of San Jose (Microsoft Corporation, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2021) 60 Cal.App.5th 783. [read post]
7 May 2021, 11:18 am
" He then "asked the California Supreme Court to transfer an additional 57 still-unadjudicated, long-delayed appeals out of the 3rd District for speedy decision elsewhere -- which the Supreme Court denied. [read post]
7 May 2021, 4:00 am
That is much different than campaign finance rules in San Jose. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
The actions are also likely to end up in the courts, leading to potentially years of debate over what is constitutional. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 1:41 pm
Tiburon, California: a 13-square-mile peninsula town in Marin County, known for its glorious views of the San Francisco Bay and its eclectic retail district. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:00 am
City of San Jose (2021) 60 Cal.App.5th 783. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 3:00 am
Supreme Court to issue a new test for when Congress could obtain those records. [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 5:16 pm
In today’s edition of The San Jose Mercury News, Maggie Angst has a front page article headlined “U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 12:00 pm
In November 2020, San Diego voters approved Measure B, which “dissolve[d] the San Diego Community Review Board on Police Practices and replace[d] it with a Commission on Police Practices. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 5:52 pm
” And Elliott Almond of The San Jose Mercury News reports that “Bay Area churches exercising caution after Supreme Court ruling; Decision will allow indoor services to resume, but amid gorgeous weather, no rush to return indoors. [read post]
