Search for: "Sanford V. Levinson" Results 81 - 100 of 132
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2012, 10:59 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
But Article V of the Constitution, Levinson writes, makes it one of the world’s most difficult to amend. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm by Andrew Koppelman
With all the extensive discussion of the merits (or lack thereof) of the constitutional complaints against the health insurance mandate, it’s worth taking a moment to reflect on what it would mean if the Court struck it down.Jack Balkin and Sanford Levinson have distinguished two senses in which constitutional law decisions can be political. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
 Sanford Levinson (Texas--Law & Political Science) offers a fascinating response to Greene. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:55 pm by Harvard Law Review
  More particularly, Levinson asks why Prigg v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:01 pm by Frank Pasquale
In Constitutional Redemption, Jack Balkin addresses Sanford Levinson’s distinction between constitutional “catholics,” who look for a “central source of interpretive authority,” and “protestants,” who “might recognize the authority of the political branches, social movements, and even individual citizens to interpret the Constitution. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:03 pm by Jeff Gamso
It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.Chief Justice John Marshall, Marbury v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:18 pm by Alfred Brophy
Friedman, Notes toward a Sociology of Human Rights 25 Mark Tushnet, The Warren Court and the Limits of Justice  26 Elizabeth Borgwardt, “Constitutionalizing” Human Rights: The Rise and Rise of the Nuremberg Principles PART V THE PAST AND FUTURE OF LEGAL HISTORY 27 Yochai Benkler, Transformations in the Digitally Networked Environment  28 Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:02 am by Randy Barnett
In 2006, for instance, University of Texas law professor Sanford Levinson wrote a well-received book, Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where the Constitution Goes Wrong (and How We the People Can Correct It). [read post]
29 May 2010, 5:45 am by Lawrence Solum
Supreme Court decisions is Dred Scott v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm by David Kopel
Totenberg was lying, and the NRA had given her three names: Robert Cottrol of George Washington, Joseph Olson of Hamline, and Sanford Levinson of Texas. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 4:49 am by Alfred Brophy
Friedman, Notes toward a Sociology of Human Rights 25 Mark Tushnet, The Warren Court and the Limits of Justice 26 Elizabeth Borgwardt, "Constitutionalizing" Human Rights: The Rise and Rise of the Nuremberg Principles PART V THE PAST AND FUTURE OF LEGAL HISTORY 27 Yochai Benkler, Transformations in the Digitally Networked Environment 28 Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]