Search for: "Schwimmer v Schwimmer"
Results 81 - 100
of 135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2010, 9:14 am
V. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
By Jake McGowan [writings][LinkedIn] Lohan v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 3:30 am
Partner Limited Liability Shield: Ederer v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
Schwimmer (1929) (dissenting opinion). [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Here’s a roundup of what other people are saying about the decision in Network Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 8:32 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 3:59 pm
Given the resources you have to defend this as a financial services provider (see Gucci v Curveal), I doubt that there are beads of sweat on your forehead as you read this. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 4:27 am
" David Beasley v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 1:29 pm
Schwimmer, 279 U. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 12:10 am
Finally, Marty Schwimmer's Trademark Blog challenges readers to identify the images reproduced in silhouette: is this indeed a valid method of testing for the existence of secondary meaning? [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:56 am
H/T Marty Schwimmer: CGS Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:08 am
Oh, and he still owes us for the whole Bush v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:50 am
Schwimmer, 279 U. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:02 am
Schwimmer, supra). [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:31 am
§1117(a); cf., e.g., Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:58 am
Also like Viacom v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
* Bayer feels the pain: branded Naproxen can't invoke the territoriality principleKatfriend Marty Schwimmer reports on Belmora LLC v Bayer Consumer Care AG and Bayer Healthcare LLC, 1:14-cv-00847-GBL (EDVA Feb. 6, 2015), a recent US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia ruling that deals with Article 6bis of the Paris Convention in the US as it applies to Bayer’s trade mark ‘FLANAX’. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
This is a big question, taking into account the litigation of Cuban trade marks in the United States [Only accepted in TTAB proceedings: see "TTABlog Guest Comment: Marty Schwimmer on TTAB's "CUBITA" Summary Judgment Under The Pan American Convention"]. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
[Yes]Lack of Bona Fide Intent:Precedential No. 13: Lack of Bona Fide Intent Dooms Two "FUTURE" Applications, Says TTABOwnership: Precedential No. 16: TTAB Orders Cancellation of Registration - Applicant not Owner of Underlying Foreign RegistrationSpecimen of Use: Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability On These Two Mutilation Cases Non-use:Affirming Refusal, TTAB Says "HOURS OF ENERGY NOW" Not Being Used as a TrademarkCancellation Under Section 14(3):Precedential No. 19: TTAB Grants… [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:59 pm
Schwimmer, 279 U. [read post]
