Search for: "Schwimmer v Schwimmer"
Results 81 - 100
of 135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2011, 6:23 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost views Snyder in the context of Justice Holmes’s 1929 dissent in Schwimmer v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
The Battle for Blawg Review of the Year Like the movie business, with its Academy Awards, the business of blog reviewing is highly competitive. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
The Battle for Blawg Review of the Year Like the movie business, with its Academy Awards, the business of blog reviewing is highly competitive. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:49 am
By Eric Goldman After some prodding by Paul Levy of Public Citizen, Google has filed an unredacted version of its response brief in the Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 2:59 pm
Believing that we need to call a halt to the steady erosion of the public's right of access to court records, we have joined with two prominent trademark law bloggers, Eric Goldman and Marty Schwimmer, in seeking leave to intervene to seek the unsealing of the entire Joint Appendix. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:21 am
The publisher sued (complaint available from Marty Schwimmer here), and won a temporary restraining order over the weekend. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 10:09 pm
Republished by Blog Post PromoterMarty Schwimmer: IDEA v PETA (SDNY August 298 2009): Plaintiff, no doubt aware that statutory damages are only available for post-registration copyright infringements that are not part of a continuing, ongoing series of infringing acts of the same kind as those engaged by defendant prior to the [...] [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:30 am
Schwimmer, 12 N.J. 293, 301 (1953))); Caruso v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:02 am
Schwimmer, supra). [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:07 am
”) * Vegelahn v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:00 am
Schwimmer, 892 F.2d 237, 243 (2d Cir. 1989)). [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:14 am
V. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:29 am
Schwimmer, 12 N.J. 293, 302 (1953)). [read post]
2 May 2010, 8:32 pm
The best-looking group at INTA — photo from Meet the Bloggers V It just keeps getting bigger and bigger. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 4:02 pm
Where an ad is literally false, the court has the power enjoin the use without reference to the impact of the ad on the buying public (McNeil-PCC v Bristol-Myers Squibb)(1991)). [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 2:28 am
Citigroup Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
You can wrap it around you for warmth as you bound across the cold moons of Jaglan Beta; you can lie on it on the brilliant marble-sanded beaches of Santraginus V, inhaling the heady sea vapors; you can sleep under it beneath the stars which shine so redly on the desert world of Kakrafoon; use it to sail a miniraft down the slow heavy River Moth; wet it for use in hand-to-hand-combat; wrap it round your head to ward off noxious fumes or avoid the gaze of the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of… [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
You can wrap it around you for warmth as you bound across the cold moons of Jaglan Beta; you can lie on it on the brilliant marble-sanded beaches of Santraginus V, inhaling the heady sea vapors; you can sleep under it beneath the stars which shine so redly on the desert world of Kakrafoon; use it to sail a miniraft down the slow heavy River Moth; wet it for use in hand-to-hand-combat; wrap it round your head to ward off noxious fumes or avoid the gaze of the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of… [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:40 am
The 1947 novella always did seem to evoke the process of litigation on some psychological level, and here's a literal lawsuit that arose from it just lately [Schwimmer, Trademark Blog] Tags: publishers Related posts Why they aren't running the cartoons (4) Whatever happened to the Nitpicker's Guides? [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:14 pm
See Ruby Tuesday Designs LLC v. [read post]
