Search for: "Scott W Evans"
Results 81 - 91
of 91
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:37 am
bit.ly/IMDynN (PLG, University of Waterloo) New Order Update: Peck, Parties and Predictive Coding (1313 Pages Consolidated w/Index) bit.ly/xAztDv (@ComplexD) Reporting Numbers? [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am
The new legal term is in full swing and our weekly Law and Media Round Ups begin again today. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
The SEC Office of the Whistleblower posts Notices of Covered Action where a final judgment or order, by itself or together with other prior judgments or orders in the same action issued after July 21, 2010, results in monetary sanctions exceeding $1 million. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(W. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm
Scott, 512 F.Supp.2d 613, 623 (N.D. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
You put your right foot in You put your right foot out You put your right foot in And you shake it all about You do the Hokey Pokey and you turn yourself around That’s what it’s all about! [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm
Although the Court is divided, it’s not Congress; none is going to pull an Evan Bayh and walk away. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 10:24 am
Although the Court is divided, it’s not Congress; none is going to pull an Evan Bayh and walk away. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 11:06 am
In affirming the administrative law judge, the Board held that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(3) and (1) of the Act by discharging employee Ronald W. [read post]
