Search for: "Scott v. McDonald"
Results 81 - 100
of 143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
KG v Derek Scott (PatLit) (Class 99) (IPKat) April 2010 trial ordered in trade mark infringement and copycat advertising dispute between Specsavers and Asda (IPKat) ‘Give it back! [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
KG v Derek Scott (PatLit) (Class 99) (IPKat) April 2010 trial ordered in trade mark infringement and copycat advertising dispute between Specsavers and Asda (IPKat) ‘Give it back! [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
KG v Derek Scott (PatLit) (Class 99) (IPKat) April 2010 trial ordered in trade mark infringement and copycat advertising dispute between Specsavers and Asda (IPKat) 'Give it back! [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
N.Y. 1984); Schenck v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:17 am
The 6-3 ruling in California v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, January 26, 2024 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of January 19-25, 2024 Mergers and Acquisitions—2024 Posted by Victor Goldfeld, Mark Stagliano, and Mark Andriola, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, January 19, 2024 Tags: Acquisition, Activism, Antitrust, Cross-border transactions, Energy, Healthcare, M&A, Merger, Private… [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:44 pm
Partially motivated by the Supreme Court’s decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, January 26, 2024 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of January 19-25, 2024 Mergers and Acquisitions—2024 Posted by Victor Goldfeld, Mark Stagliano, and Mark Andriola, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, January 19, 2024 Tags: Acquisition, Activism, Antitrust, Cross-border transactions, Energy, Healthcare, M&A, Merger, Private… [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:51 am
At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Scott D. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of McDonald v Australian Broadcasting Corporation ([2014] NSWSC 1472) McCallum J struck out a small part of the defendant’s defence in a libel claim brought by a disgraced former Labor minister. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:53 am
As our Supreme Court recognized in Roth v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:56 am
Allen, Ethan Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm
Social media Another trend we are noticing is the number of defamation claims that relate to social media: Facebook: * Heather Reid v Stan Dukic – $180,000 for “irrational and ranting posts”, ACT. * Kenneth Rothe v David Scott – $150,000 for an accusation of paedophilia, NSW. * Kelly v Levick – $10,000 for an accusation of being a “money crazed bitch” by her husband, Queensland. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
FosterThe Scott K. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:48 am
News and World Report writes on the report, as does Mark McDonald in the International Herald Tribune as well as Eric Beidel at National Defense Magazine. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am
Pennsylvania or Dred Scott, it would also have been helpful to include some relevant cases from northern states, such as licensing Roberts v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 10:39 am
See Wong v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
Only one omitted McDonald. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am
Platt, Scott T. [read post]
