Search for: "Seagate Technology"
Results 81 - 100
of 307
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2009, 2:11 pm
But it’s well within the usual range of $50-100 million that most acquirers pay for technology that has not yet matured into a business. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:39 pm
The FTC reviewed the Western Digital/Hitachi transaction at the same time as it reviewed Seagate Technology/Samsung transaction. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 7:07 am
Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc. et al, 2-16-cv-00538 (PAWD January 18, 2018, Order) (Bissoon, USDJ) [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 7:08 am
Lucent Technologies (E.D. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 12:33 pm
Seagate Technology’s $185 million acquisition of EVault has turned up the heat in the data backup services space. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 10:38 am
Twitter appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 1:23 am
In re Seagate Technology LLC - January 26, 2007 The Federal Circuit issued a sua sponte order on Friday to address the following questions en banc:(1) Should a party's assertion of the advice of counsel defense to willful infringement extend waiver of the attorney-client privilege to communications with that party's trial counsel? [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 11:55 am
On Thursday, July 25, 2012, the International Trade Commission (ITC) terminated an investigation into whether certain Rambus patents were being infringed by Garmin International, Cisco Systems, Seagate Technologies and others. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:55 am
By contrast, the directors at Seagate Technology (STX) each made more than $340,000 last fiscal year (ending July 1) — and as much as $396,645, according to the proxy the company filed on Monday. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:51 pm
Technology is making it easier, and cheaper, to store data. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 5:39 pm
The Federal Circuit had pronounced this test nearly a decade ago in In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F. 3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 11:17 am
In the Seagate/Samsung merger, MOFCOM required Seagate to establish an independent subsidiary to produce, price and market Samsung products and to build a firewall to prevent information from being exchanged between Seagate and the Samsung subsidiary. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 11:17 am
In the Seagate/Samsung merger, MOFCOM required Seagate to establish an independent subsidiary to produce, price and market Samsung products and to build a firewall to prevent information from being exchanged between Seagate and the Samsung subsidiary. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm
Accordingly, the Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC’s January 29, 2010 final determination in Investigation No. 337-TA-665, which found no violation of Section 337 by LSI Corporation, Seagate Technology, Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Memory Products (US) Corporation, and Seagate (US) with respect to Qimonda AG’s U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 5:07 am
Manifestó que el estándar de In re Seagate Technology, LLC id. impone una carga evidenciaría que no contempló el Congreso cuando legisló el 35 U. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:07 am
§ 284, repealing [In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:09 am
Although nothing in [In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 6:59 am
The Complainant in this investigation is Qimonda AG and the Respondents are LSI Corporation, Seagate Technology, Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Memory Products (US) Corporation, Seagate Technologies International (Singapore), and Seagate (US) LLC (collectively “Respondentsâ€). [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:12 pm
., and Seagate Technology (collectively, “Respondents”) in Certain Semiconductor Chips and Products Containing Same (Inv. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 1:33 pm
Department of Commerce administrative penalty for violation of Export Administration Regulations (EAR) pertaining to the Chinese technology company, Huawei Technologies Co. [read post]
