Search for: "Sealed Defendant 7" Results 81 - 100 of 796
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2010, 9:25 am by Matt C. Bailey
As reasoned by the Court, the defendant’s reconsideration motion, which was based on new Ninth Circuit authority, failed to meet the requirements of Local Rule 7-9 insofar as the opinion was actually issued prior to the Court’s certification order: Although the parties cannot be faulted for not knowing the precise date the Court will file its orders, they should bring to the Court's attention as soon as possible any facts or law that may affect the motion. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:15 am by David M. Trontz
The allegations suggest that Ana Blanco operated Trinity Closing Group to seal the deals. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:28 am by Intelligent Challenge
In particular special operations success can often be defined in terms of “relative superiority” – that is the ability of a smaller attacking force to gain a decisive advantage over a larger or well defended enemy. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 5:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Undersigned counsel provided a copy of this Motion to Defense Counsel, who has advised that Defendant does not oppose the relief requested. [7.] [read post]
31 May 2013, 5:48 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Further, it is clear that the data regarding defendant's driving record was placed on the document after the seal was affixed. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 5:19 pm by Gregory J. Brodzik
Special Master Seitz found that the 7 remaining categories of information were appropriately designated as “Highly Confidential,” but he was nevertheless required to address defendants’ alternative request to modify the protective order to use the protected information in the anticipated reexamination. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Thankfully, I'm not actually the defendant, but rather the intervenor and appellee: The case below is Buckert v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:22 am by Melinda Ghilardi
(3) Whether various emails intercepted pursuant to two warrant-authorized wiretaps should have been suppressed because they were not immediately sealed upon the warrant’s expiration pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 1:34 am by Ben Vernia
On July 7, the Department of Justice announced a settlement in a qui tam suit brought against a security contractor in Afghanistan. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 1:31 pm
Convicted of Grand Larceny in the First Degree in Manhattan Supreme Court, a New York trial jury has sealed Anthony Marshall's fate. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:04 am by Lyle Denniston
  The opposition remains under seal. [read post]