Search for: "Sears v. Rule" Results 81 - 100 of 478
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2019, 2:06 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
Justice Lebous believed none of it, issuing a searing written decision holding Zaven and Jo Ann in contempt. [read post]
(This article originally was published by Law360 on July 1, 2019.) [read post]
28 May 2019, 6:26 am by The Swartz Law Firm
The district court ruled in favor of the correctional officers based on the Eleventh Circuit’s precedence in O’Bryant v Finch. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:41 am by Cyberleagle
One person may enjoy reading a piece of searing prose. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542 (Fed. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In contrast, in Schuyler v New York State and Local Employees' Retirement System, 158 AD3d 909, the Appellate Division ruled that a "lack of documentation, coupled with information suggesting that petitioner's services were performed as an independent contractor rather than a state employee, supports the Comptroller's denial of petitioner's request for additional service credit. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In contrast, in Schuyler v New York State and Local Employees' Retirement System, 158 AD3d 909, the Appellate Division ruled that a "lack of documentation, coupled with information suggesting that petitioner's services were performed as an independent contractor rather than a state employee, supports the Comptroller's denial of petitioner's request for additional service credit. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The 2017 tax law made the first $22 million of an estate tax free, so (also because of generous trust rules) only a tiny fraction of estates is ever taxed either as income or upon death.Is it Constitutional to Tax the Rich by Taxing Unrealized Income? [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Sherita Sears submitted a claim for certain benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §205-a, claim predicated on an alleged violation of Labor Law §27-a,The Appellate Division ruled that the plaintiff in this action, Sherita Sears, was not entitled to recover under GML §205-a,*as the injuries Jamel Sears had sustained while participating in FST exercises were not the type of occupational injury that Labor Law §27-a** was designed to address. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Sherita Sears submitted a claim for certain benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §205-a, claim predicated on an alleged violation of Labor Law §27-a,The Appellate Division ruled that the plaintiff in this action, Sherita Sears, was not entitled to recover under GML §205-a,*as the injuries Jamel Sears had sustained while participating in FST exercises were not the type of occupational injury that Labor Law §27-a** was designed to address. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
In Caparo v Dickman Lord Bridge cautioned against discussing duties of care in abstract terms divorced from factual context: “It is never sufficient to ask simply whether A owes B a duty of care. [read post]