Search for: "Senior v. Hope"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,368
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 5:14 pm
Near the end of the majority opinion of Chief Justice Roberts in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 2:30 am
By Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert & Anne K. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
Conduct may also give rise to criminal offences for senior managers who fail to respond to information and data requests from Ofcom. 3. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:43 pm
By Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert & Allyson B. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 7:59 pm
By Philip Won & Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert —“Total Product Life Cycle Advisory Program or TAP pilot — the most exciting thing in MDUFA V. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
Chapter 28 of Outside In describes Back v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:20 am
The decision in Michigan v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 4:00 am
In this way we hope to promote their work, with their permission, to as wide an audience as possible. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:33 am
Innovative Solutions Consulting LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 3:52 pm
I hope not, because such a rule would be inappropriate. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm
(He has a bad habit of ignoring unhelpful precedent; See U.S. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 1:01 pm
Following a summary judgment hearing last week, the Resolute v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
In this context, we have been successful in completing rules related to how insiders trade and sell their stock,[18] clawing back senior executives’ compensation when base [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm
Concerning private pacts, Biskupic does a flashback to NFIB v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 7:07 pm
They could still identify Sisvel v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Revd Paul Williamson in court again In July 1997, the Revd Paul Williamson was made the subject of a Civil Proceedings Order as a vexatious litigant pursuant to s.42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Restriction of vexatious legal proceedings), primarily as a result of a series of proceedings arising from his opposition to the ordination of women: see R v HM Attorney-General ex parte Reverend Paul Stewart Williamson [1997] EWHC Admin 691. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 6:05 am
Letelier v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 11:06 am
More Information We hope this update is helpful. [read post]
