Search for: "Sewell v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2021, 12:11 pm by Victoria Gallegos
Rubenstein analyzed the implications of the Texas v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Han and Tia Sewell shared a Justice Department motion in opposition to a petition for a writ of habeas corpus regarding the transfer of Guantánamo detainee Majid Khan. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:16 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Dallas lawyer Peter Vogel of Gardere Wynne Sewell on his Vogel Internet, Information Technology and e-Discovery Blog Bank Failures: A State-by-State Affair - Ohio attorney Kevin LaCroix of OakBridge Insurance Services in his blog, The D & O Diary When a Promise Is Not a Promise in College Athletics - Los Angeles lawyer Jeffrey Kravitz of Fox Rothschild on the firm's Sports Law Scoreboard [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:01 am by Anna Salvatore
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the latest news in Trump v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:57 pm by Hyemin Han
Orpett, Benjamin Pollard, Katherine Pompilio, and Tia Sewell  presented a guide to Lawfare’s coverage of the aftermath of the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 9:28 am by Tia Sewell
Tia Sewell explained how the Trump-appointed CEO of the U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:51 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 12:51 am by Frank Cranmer
Mr Sewell was convicted of her rape and of indecently assaulting two other people in 2014. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Vera Miranova provided her interviews with foreign Islamic State women about accountability and punishments for Islamic State activities. [read post]
22 May 2010, 2:44 pm by MacIsaac
Justice Sewell decided that the Plaintiff’s knee in fact was injured. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:24 am by Dennis Crouch
[Link] Already on appeal to the Federal Circuit is FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:04 am
Center 1700Decided: March 23, 2016Like in Sewell and Kuijper, the Board reversed here because the examiner did not identify a sufficient reason for a person of ordinary skill to have modified the base reference in the proposed manner. [read post]