Search for: "Shepherd v. May"
Results 81 - 100
of 369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2017, 12:52 pm
That case (Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina et al. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 3:07 pm
That case (Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina et al. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:31 am
Game & Fish Comm’n v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:37 am
Comm’n v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
May you rest in peace “Big George”. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:03 pm
Andrew Kent examined the Supreme Court’s decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 5:06 pm
It could also find that Kohl’s statements were made with a “reckless or wanton disregard for the truth” (Shepherd v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 11:00 pm
The key authority on joint tortfeasorship comes from Fish & Fish v Sea Shepherd (see the judgment being handed down on the UK Supreme Court blog here!). [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
Social Worker’s Facebook Rant Justified Termination — Shepherd v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Summary of conclusions reached 5‑year prescription: awareness of loss, sections 11(3) and 6(4) [5] While it is possible that losses which were easily identifiable by HC may have occurred in 2007, leading to the triggering of the 5‑year prescription in 2007 (i.e. more than five years before the actions were raised in 2014: see paragraphs [58] to [61] below), this is a matter of dispute which cannot be resolved on the… [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:54 am
Master Clark considered the authorities including HHJ Hacon's interpretation of the Supreme Court in Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish Ltd [2015] UKSC 10: "I interpret this to mean that in order to fix an alleged joint tortfeasor with liability, it must be shown both that he actively co-operated to bring about the act of the primary tortfeasor and also that he intended that his co-operation would help to bring about that act (the act found to be tortious). [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:36 am
The latest case, The National Guild of Removers And Storers Ltd v Bee Moved Ltd & Ors [2016] EWHC 3192 (IPEC), is in a similar vein to the earlier decisions. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 6:04 am
Lewison LJ summarised the position in Honda Motor Co Ltd v Neesam [2006] EWHC 1051 para 5 (not on bailii) as:Consent must be unequivocally demonstrated.An intention to renounce the right to a trade mark will normally be gathered from an express statement.Although consent may be inferred in some circumstances, an actual consent (not a deemed consent) be established. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 9:11 am
Desert View * Teacher’s Semi-Racy Facebook Photo Doesn’t Justify Firing – In re Laraine Cook * Social Worker’s Facebook Rant Justified Termination — Shepherd v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm
Fox News v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:15 am
The law has been recently considered by the Supreme Court in Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish Limited [2015] UKSC 10; [2015] AC 1229, which I sought to summarise in Vertical Leisure Limited v Poleplus Limited [2015] EWHC 841 (IPEC). [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:24 pm
Congratulations to Ron Colemen for shepherding this case and Profs Volokh and Banner who apparently wrote the petition response. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:39 am
Mintz, supra.The Superior Court went on to explain that[p]laintiffs filed their complaint on May 18, 2010. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 10:06 am
Shepherd v. [read post]
