Search for: "Sherman v. Doe et al"
Results 81 - 100
of 101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
NFL, et al (08-661) case (argument date unscheduled), which will test whether the National Football League's exclusive apparel licensing deal with Reebok violates antitrust rules. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 10:46 am
McDonough et al. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
(Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) Hill Times features op-ed by Michael Geist concerning copyright lobby recycling (Michael Geist) Owner of Glo Salon and Spa sues former employees now working at competitor for $6.4 million in damages over alleged misappropriation of trade secrets in the form of client lists and client colour cards (IP Osgoode) Federal court issues practice direction aimed at streamlining complex litigation (International Law Office) China Get involved in Chinese IP policy… [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Tinker et al. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 2:59 pm
Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA, et al. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Kent School District, et al.; Kent School District, et al. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 7:05 am
Roberts, Jr., wrote for the Court in Pacific Bell, et al., v. linkLine Communications (07-512). [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(Afro-IP) Europe Advocate General opines advertisement comparing perfume to L’Oreal’s did not infringe trade marks; translation issue: L’Oréal v Bellure (Out-Law) (IPKat) (Class 46) (IPKat) (Class 46) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) Advocate General opines in Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening concerning the storing and printing of small amounts of text extract from newspapers (IPKat),… [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 8:14 am
Circuit in its FTC v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
Existing Federal Legislation Generally speaking, anti-trust laws cover three broad areas: collusion among competitors, anti-competitive mergers, and exclusionary practices.[13] Prevention of collusion falls under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, which Congress intended to protect the right of producers to compete on their merits, and, in turn, the right of consumers to enjoy the lower prices that must result from that competition.[14] Thus, horizontal… [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
Winter, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 6:01 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Sherman Harris v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
Edward Borey, et al., No. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Sex offense recidivism rates Approximately 1-2% of adult males will eventually be convicted of a sexual assault, but this does not mean that they are all equally likely to repeat their crimes (Hanson & Bussiere, 1998; Hanson & Morton-Bourgon, 2005). [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 12:55 pm
Supreme Court's recent ruling in Bell Atlantic Corp v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 4:43 pm
The Supreme Court has issued an opinion in BELL ATLANTIC CORP. et al. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
Solicitor General for the federal government's views on a significant antitrust case involving drug manufacturers -- Joblove, et al., v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 7:22 am
Sherman et al., "Stray Bullets and ‘Mushrooms': Random Shootings of Bystanders in Four Cities, 1977-1988," 5 J. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 1:56 pm
(The stay application is Stroup, et al., v. [read post]
