Search for: "Shy v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,815
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2008, 4:56 pm
Supreme Court's recent decision in MedellÃÂn v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:12 am
Although disparate impact may be relevant evidence of discrimination such evidence is insufficient to prove a constitutional violation even where the Fourteenth Amendment subjects state action to strict scrutiny, the plurality explained, citing Board of Trustees of Univ of Ala v Garrett (8 ADD ¶8-198). [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 12:00 pm
Winsor- the attorney arguing for Florida, admitted that such a result was both authorized by Florida law and violated Ring v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 7:11 pm
United States Court of AppealsFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT____________No. 07-5127 September Term 200806cv00217Filed On: November 17, 2008 Free Enterprise Fund and Beckstead andWatts, LLP,Appellants v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 11:21 pm
Violating the terms of a disciplinary probationDavis v DMNA, App. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 6:00 am
This matter, styled United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:41 pm
This morning the court issued an opinion in Kisor v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:33 pm
Id., at 829 (quoting United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
” There is “nothing unfair about requiring companies that avail themselves of the states’ benefits to bear an equal share of the burden of tax collection,” Kennedy said. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm
On February 22, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:53 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2005, 5:00 am
March 16, 2005), United States v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:14 am
Vernon v PERB, 289 A.D.2d 674, motion for leave to appeal denied, 97 N.Y.2d 613In considering the appeal of the City of Mt. [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:37 pm
S. 73, 80 (2002) (quoting United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:08 am
The issue is whether SLUSA preempts a class action in which the plaintiff-victims allege “(1) that they “purchase[d]” uncovered securities (certificates of deposit that [we]re not traded on any national exchange), but (2) that the defendants falsely told the victims that the uncovered securities were backed by covered securities. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:08 am
The issue is whether SLUSA preempts a class action in which the plaintiff-victims allege “(1) that they “purchase[d]” uncovered securities (certificates of deposit that [we]re not traded on any national exchange), but (2) that the defendants falsely told the victims that the uncovered securities were backed by covered securities. [read post]
10 Mar 2006, 6:26 am
De esta forma se pretende evitar que estén sujetos a presiones o represalias de los poderes "polÃticos" en caso de que sus fallos no contenten a sus pretensiones.La más básica de estas garantÃas es la de la estabilidad en el cargo: los jueces duran en sus empleos mientras dure su buen desempeño, y las formas de destitución requieren complejos procedimientos que… [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 2:06 pm
The Second Circuit is usually not shy to certify unclear questions of New York law to the New York State Court of Appeals. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:44 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:27 pm
S. 303, 308 (1980) (quoting American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. [read post]
