Search for: "Sinclair v. Ins*" Results 81 - 100 of 224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2012, 1:33 am by S
Its functions were therefore plainly judicial in nature and it was also noted that the Court of Appeal had previously decided that the LVT and Lands Tribunal were courts for the purposes of Article 6 of the Convention (R (Sinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington Ltd) v Lands Tribunal [2005] EWCA Civ 1305).The Divisional Court decided to exercise their discretion and make the order. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:33 am by S
Its functions were therefore plainly judicial in nature and it was also noted that the Court of Appeal had previously decided that the LVT and Lands Tribunal were courts for the purposes of Article 6 of the Convention (R (Sinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington Ltd) v Lands Tribunal [2005] EWCA Civ 1305).The Divisional Court decided to exercise their discretion and make the order. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 4:53 am by chief
” Since the Court of Appeal decision, the Upper Tribunal has allowed two appeals where the first instance tribunal had held that an RTM company could exercise the right over multiple blocks: Sinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington) Ltd v Darlaston Court RTM Ltd [ 2015 ] UKUT 277 (LC) and Sinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington) Ltd v The Maltings (Stanstead Abbots) Management Co Ltd [ 2015 ] UKUT 278 (LC). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:17 pm by emagraken
It is not for the plaintiff to decide which doctor can examine him or her on behalf of the defendant: Sinclair v. [read post]