Search for: "Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2017, 3:47 pm
United States (Fiduciary Duty)Finn v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 6:30 am
A close reading of the opinion, in light of three later cases decided in the early 19th century, reveals that the Supreme Court intended to recognize "Indian title" while granting the United States a right of first refusal if tribes sought to sell property on the open market to non-Indians. [read post]
2 May 2017, 9:42 am
Sioux Nation, and United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:48 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 8:52 am
Jackson (Indian Reservation Diminishment)United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:32 pm
Jackson (Indian Reservation Diminishment) United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:02 am
Here are the materials in Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:49 pm
District Court in Standing Rock Sioux v U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 10:42 am
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2016cta.htmlStanding Rock Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 2:20 pm
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2016cta.html Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 10:00 am
Through this case, Oglala Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
Here’s a bit of history, mostly from my reading of United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 8:19 pm
In CFPB v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:00 am
Here: The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, hundreds of Indian tribes that support its position, and the thousands of Indians that stand by its side in Cannonball lost an important ruling by a federal court on the Dakota Access Pipeline fight (DAPL), only to learn minutes later that the Obama administration, the defendant in Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 11:18 am
Specifically, Appellants allege they are lineal descendants of the Mdewakanton band of the Sioux tribe who were loyal to the United States during the 1862 uprising (“loyal Mdewakanton”). [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 11:08 am
United States’ brief here. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 4:59 am
Here is the complaint in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 5:12 am
Here is the complaint in Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:47 am
The loan agreements also provided that they were "governed by the Indian Commerce Clause of the Constitution of the United States of America and the laws of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 1:37 pm
Utah (Jurisdiction)United States v. [read post]
