Search for: "Slack v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
These include digital forensic preservation and investigation, notification of a broad range of third parties and other constituencies,[1] fulfillment of state and federal compliance obligations, potential litigation, engagement with law enforcement, the provision of credit monitoring, crisis management, a communications plan – and the list goes on. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 6:46 am
As Wikipedia explains, bankruptcy in the United Statesis a matter placed under federal jurisdiction by the United States Constitution (in Article 1,Section 8, Clause 4), which allows Congress to enact `uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States’. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:18 am
Daoud v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 1:49 pm
No slacking off. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:21 pm
Few if any prosecutions are initiated for marijuana possession—even, recently, in Colorado and Washington, where state law does not pick up the slack. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:23 am
American Meat Institute v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 12:50 pm
I've taught the Watergate Tapes case — United States v. [read post]
24 May 2014, 10:23 am
The United States is very unlikely to come up with any similar ruling, largely because of our First Amendment free speech legal tradition. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:10 am
A new entrant (unnamed in some of the summary’s slides but clearly SpaceX) would not be able to pick up the slack, either, the summary noted. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:56 pm
For an interesting discussion of the issue, which expresses some sympathy to those who warn their family members, see United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:10 pm
United States Jaycees (1984), the Supreme Court said that the Constitution protects certain intimate relationships, like marriage. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm
Judiciary Law § 510 provides that to be qualified as a juror a person must: (1) be a citizen of the United States, and a resident of the county, (2) be not less than eighteen years of age, (3) not have been convicted of a felony, and (4) be able to understand and communicate in the English language. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 7:03 am
Justice O'Connor regrets Bush v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:49 pm
§ 1462; see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 2:23 pm
The United States is a little less monolithic, but tends to favor preemption in many if not most cases. read more [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
United States, 11-8278, a habeas case from the Third Circuit involving claims of error under Brady, Batson, and Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(6) (codifying the forfeiture-by-wrongdoing exception to the hearsay rules). [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:41 am
By Daniel RichardsonCity of Montpelier v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:33 am
United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009), and Davis v. [read post]
