Search for: "Small v. The State of New York et al"
Results 81 - 100
of 307
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2010, 11:36 pm
LiveUniverse, Inc., et al. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 2:31 pm
The Commission appears to have based its finding on promising early experiences in a handful of large departments, including Oakland, New York City, and Kansas City. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 7:11 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York (Gilman v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Kroeger, et al. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
Chobani’s Notice of Removal further stated that a factually similar class action—Stoltz, et al. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Texas, et al. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:43 am
The court says that either New York or California law governs, and the result would be the same under either state’s law. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
The state and its instrumentalities tend to be risk averse--the essence of the ideology of compliance based governmentality. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 5:18 pm
Rogers, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2016) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2016 WL 891405. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
[et al.] [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 1:34 pm
In total, 134 people with hepatitis A have been reported from nine states: Arkansas (1), California (1), Maryland (12), New York (3), North Carolina (1), Oregon (1), Virginia (107), West Virginia (7), and Wisconsin (1). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views… [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views… [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 7:37 am
Nuveen LLC, et al. , No.2019-0169-SG memorandum opinion (Del. [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:07 pm
Dictor, who represented many of those employees in a lawsuit against Melngailis (Coltelli et al v. [read post]
