Search for: "Smart v. Smart" Results 81 - 100 of 3,965
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2009, 9:09 am by Clerquette LeClerq
  Clerquette expects an answer to the following question (and yes: that was the sound of the whip cracking, my darlings):For scoring purposes, is the Sotomayor v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 1:54 pm
Oral Argument in case# 09-2646; Smart Marketing Grou v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:49 am
Former NYC employee fined $10,000 by the NYC ConflictsConflicts of Interest Board v Smart, OATH Index No. 2588/09In June 2009, ALJ Kara Miller found that a former City employee, Pauline Smart, violated the City Conflicts of Interest Law by using her position as an eligibility specialist to obtain personal information about a welfare recipient which the specialist used to obtain a cell phone [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 3:39 pm by luiza
In January 2022, the question of whether a claim for damages arising from the Smart Card Chips cartel was time barred was heard as a preliminary issue in the English High Court case of Gemalto Holding BV and another v Infineon Technologies AG and others [2022] EWHC 156 (Ch). [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:29 pm by Peter Tillers
Some people are agnostic on the issue of human stupidity v. human intelligence, and some people are indifferent to the issue. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 2:03 am by Cheryl Beise
Cheryl BeiseThe federal district court in Chicago did not err in dismissing a patent infringement suit filed by Maxon, LLC against several smart television manufacturers on the ground that the asserted patents—describing an electronic means of increasing user control over subscription entertainment content for smart TVs—were invalid as directed to an abstract idea that lacked an inventive concept, the U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:31 am
  You'll discover that it's not quite the compliment that you might otherwise take it to be.It means that you're smart enough to open a bank account. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 3:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Eleventh Circuit Judge Stanley Marcus's concurrence in Speech First, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 12:54 am
Hooray for smart corporate/constitutional comedy. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 7:45 pm
The ruling hasn’t been available before today, but here it is: Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:56 am by Broc Romanek
Chevron/FedEx Appeal Voluntarily Dismissed: Smart But Problematic Tactical Move Here's news from this blog by Prof. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 12:35 pm by lpcprof
Reagan Seidler, Law Society of Upper Canada, Smart & Biggar, has published The Law of Haunted Houses: A Comment on Stigmatized Properties following Wang v Shao 54 (2) UBC Law Rev. 455 (2021). [read post]