Search for: "Smith v Country Serv., Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
In Hurley v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
The recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in, R. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
(Green Patent Blog) Global - Copyright Conference calls on WIPO to boost support for collective management of copyright and related rights (WIPO) Librarians take the copyright battleground in developing countries (Intellectual Property Watch) Creative Commons study on how people understand the term ‘noncommercial use’ (Creative Commons) Africa Time to follow the example of Nashville? [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 10:36 am
Medtronic, Inc., No. 2014-CV-245871, slip op. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
If only some, then there’s the additional question of how much effort the legal system should expend, or force the parties to expend, in sorting one from the other.We thought we’d explore that question today, and we start by comparing arguably the most pro-plaintiff state in the country – Idaho – on comment k issues with the most pro-defense state – California. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
Because policy preferences differ across states, regulating at the state level can in the aggregate satisfy more individual preferences than a uniform national law.[3] And federalism also lets states serve as "laboratories" that can experiment with various options, and show the way for other states (and perhaps for an eventual national rule).[4] A uniform national law is sometimes appropriate to implement important national values or correct various state-level pathologies. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States Issue: Whether a district court may direct a defendant to serve a federal sentence consecutively to a not-yet-imposed state sentence. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 12:55 am
ALM Privacy Policy / Contact Us
© 2007 ALM Properties, Inc. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:57 am
Thus Smith v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Boerne v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 1:18 am
Just a few Terms ago, this Court declined to apply heightened scrutiny to a Presidential Proclamation limiting immigration from Muslim-majority countries, even though President Trump had described the Proclamation as a "Muslim Ban," originally conceived of as a "'total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on.'" Trump v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
Ritzen Group Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
A website blocking order was granted in the case of Columbia Pictures Industries Inc and Ors v British Telecommunications Plc and Ors [2021] EWHC 2799 (Ch). [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
This week the Court released the calendar for arguments at the end of November and into December these cases are: Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
On 10th February 2023, the Federal Court refused leave to file documents sent to the court in defamation proceedings in the case of Rana v Google Inc (No 2) [2023] FCA 81. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Forest City Enterprises, Inc.,[2] 426 U.S. 668 (1976) (due process limitations)· K.K. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:32 am
” (Turner Broad Sys Inc v FCC (1997)). [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
