Search for: "Smith v. AC"
Results 81 - 100
of 197
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2009, 8:46 pm
Established inquisitorial procedure. 1641 Abolition of the Star Chamber 1641 Habeas Corpus Act 1641 - Treaty of Hamburg (putting an end to the Thirty Years’ war) 1648 - Peace of Westphalie 1651 Leviathan - Thomas Hobbes 1681 - Treaty of The Hague 1689 English Bill of Rights - “surely the foundation for the US Constitution’s bill of rights and much of Anglo-saxon liberty thereafter, worldwide”. 1698 - Another Treaty of The Hague 1698 Piracy Act - making piracy… [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 39 [week ending Sunday 29 March] – Merpel writes to the EPO AC | CJEU and hyperlinks | New gTLD regime | AG on TM reputation and genuine use in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV | AMBA speaks | Digital exhaustion | CJEU on linking to live shows in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment| EPO Enlarged Board on amendments’ clarity in G 3/14… [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 1:04 pm
As per Lord Reid in London Corporation v Cusack-Smith [1955] AC 337: “A, the freeholder, may let to B for a rent of £100 which is a rack-rent at the date of B’s lease, and later B may sublet to C for a rent of £200 which is a rack-rent at the date of C’s lease. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm
In Mosley at para 229 Eady J directed himself to take into account awards in defamation cases, and referred also to Gleaner Company Ltd v Abrahams [2004] 1 AC 628. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:44 am
Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known as Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd, heard 12-13 November 2019. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 1:32 am
Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known as Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd), heard 12-13 November 2019. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 2:56 am
Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known as Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd, heard 12-13 November 2019. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 4:55 am
Pitts provided the case number that she was given for her aggravated burglary report to Absolute Comput[r]ace. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am
Ltd v Babco Forwarding & Shipping (UK) Ltd. [1978] AC 141 and hold that excise duty payable in respect of goods which are stolen in the course of international carriage by road cannot be claimed under article 23.44 of the Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road 1956. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Smith & Nephew, 2005 WL 3470337, at *5 (M.D. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
Ziuz (EPLAW) District Court of The Hague refuses to lift injunction: Middenweg v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a… [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
In that context, it has been held that “the values enshrined in Articles 8 and 10 are now part of the cause of action for breach of confidence” (See Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 at [17] (Lord Nicholls) and that it is necessary to consider Strasbourg jurisprudence to establish the scope of that domestic cause of action, since those Articles are now “not merely of persuasive or parallel effect” but are “the very content of… [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 4:37 am
Cramphorn, [1967] Ch 254 – also Howard Smith v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Held On gateway b challenges: Following Smith v Buckland [2008] 1 WLR 661, the challenge extended beyond Wednesbury unreasonableness. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Held On gateway b challenges: Following Smith v Buckland [2008] 1 WLR 661, the challenge extended beyond Wednesbury unreasonableness. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
(G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2004] 2 AC 208 (HL(E)) establishes that it is not possible to carve out a section 17 duty to house families where children are already accommodated. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
(G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2004] 2 AC 208 (HL(E)) establishes that it is not possible to carve out a section 17 duty to house families where children are already accommodated. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
M advised ACS that the child was no longer living with her and that she wished to stop receiving the subsidy. [read post]
