Search for: "Smith v. California Department of Corrections "
Results 81 - 100
of 156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2007, 7:46 am
On June 12, 2006, the Supreme Court handed down a ruling in Hill v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:47 am
California, supra; United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
On November 18, 2011, the Agency issued a correction to its Letter of Acceptance in response to Complainant’s November 8, 2011 letter. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: Personal Restraint of Gentry: Death row prisoner Jonathan Lee Gentry brought a challenge to his conditions of confinement as implemented by the Washington State Department of Corrections in 2009, claiming he has been effectively placed in indefinite solitary… [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
As always, these summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
The judge revoked his probation, but rejected the four-year prison sentence recommended by the Department of Corrections and instead sentenced Graham, by then 17, to life in prison without parole. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:06 am
B.J.F., 491 U.S. 524 (1989) and Smith v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
Missouri Department Of Corrections, 245 S.W.3d 236 (Mo. 2008) "The same long-standing principles applied in Phillips apply in this case. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
Smith v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:47 am
” The relevant regulations focus on communications services, and in Est. of Smith v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
(The court faced but did not decide the issue of whether to overrule Smith in Fulton v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 12218-20 Faulkner v LancsLive, 2 Privacy (2019), 14 Confidential sources (2019), No breach – after investigation. 12103-20 Smith v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), No breach – after investigation. 11902-20 Khan v Birminghammail.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation. 10490-20 Devlin v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1 Accuracy… [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am
Part V analyzes the prospects of using litigation to reform prisoner isolation in Canada by drawing lessons from the US experience, where litigation has brought hidden practices to the public’s attention and awoken moral sensibilities, sowing the seeds for negotiated reform with elected officials and correctional administrators. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
” Fortunately, the Department of Treasury recently proposed regulations that provide guidance regarding how to calculate whether an ICHRA provides “affordable” coverage. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, September 24, 2008 Smith v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm
Rulings IPSO has issued six rulings: 04324-19 Macdonald v Evening Telegraph (Dundee), 2 Privacy (2018), No breach – after investigation 04186-19 Mmono v Manchester Evening News, 1 Accuracy (2018), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 03509-19 McEleny v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 04225-19 Versi v The Sun, 1 Accuracy (2018), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 02706-19 Stroud… [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
Indeed, one of the cases Rumsey cites on how to apply stare decisis, Smith v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The Department of Labor Administrative Review Board (Board) found a violation of the employee protection provision of the Wendell H. [read post]
