Search for: "Smith v. Deem"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,053
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
Moreover, there are no allegations related to breaching a promise to acehive a specific result, but only allegations about breaches of vague and non-specific (and somewhat boilerplate) provisions of the retainer agreement (see Mamoon v Dot Net Inc., 135 AD3d 656 [1st Dept 2016] citing Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose, 251 AD2d 3 5, 3 9 [1st Dept 1998] [ dismissing breach of contract claim as duplicative of legal malpractice claim where there were no allegations about a breach of… [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
This episode is a follow-up podcast to Episode 9, Epic v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
And because she has not done anything that could be deemed a violation of the CADA, CO has not taken any action against her. ** Note: Smith filed her initial complaint in 2016, asserting her plans to open up a wedding website. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:32 am
Nev. 2022); see also Smith v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:30 am
In the case of Hinerman v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Yesterday's closing argument in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
In Hurley v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:55 pm
The film proved to be a star turn for Will Smith and Martin Lawrence and was followed by two sequels. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:22 pm
Sineneng-Smith. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
From Wednesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Firefighters4Freedom v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am
” Finally, Judge Jackson was “not so sure” whether the tapes should have been deemed presidential records, given that the PRA’s definition excludes “personal notes serving as the functional equivalent of a diary or journal which are not prepared or utilized for, or circulated or communicated in the course of, transacting Government business. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
Congress did just that in the Ethics in Government Act, but SCOTUS upheld the independent counsel in Morrison v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:43 pm
That was fortunate because Mr Justice Marcus Smith, the President of the CAT, suspended the livestream for the first couple of hours. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:06 am
One key overlap between Mr Justice Smith's approach in Optis v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:27 pm
" Rumsfeld v. [read post]
28 May 2023, 12:15 am
Parish councils have other powers that enable their contribution towards the upkeep of these buildings if it were deemed to be within their local communities’ interest to do so. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am
For instance, in Smith v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 5:16 am
Second, while Smith concerned a particular book deemed obscene by the lower courts, the Supreme Court’s concern was not about the author or readers of that book. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
