Search for: "Smith v. Employment Division"
Results 81 - 100
of 639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
This issue may also arise in connection with an employee's former employer supplying information to a prospective employer of the individual in response to a request for "references" (see Buxton v Plant City, 57 LW 2649). [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:37 am
EFFECT: This law is a legislative overturning of a California Court of Appeal decision (Rope v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:25 am
On Wednesday, Mr Justice Norris (Chancery Division, England and Wales) gave his ruling in Burrows v Smith, Crush Digital Media Ltd [2010] EWHC 22 (Ch), an interesting little copyright/breach of confidence dispute. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:12 am
Accordingly, the Appellate Division concluded that neither educator could avail herself of the hearing procedures set out in Education Law §3020-a.Further, while a counseling letter is “active” in a personnel file, the district may subsequently initiate disciplinary action based on the same event and the memorandum itself could be introduced as evidence in the course of the disciplinary proceeding.On this point, as the Court of Appeal ruled in Patterson v… [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:09 pm
Smith, 726 P.2d 423, 426 (Utah 1986). [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 7:09 pm
Smith, 726 P.2d 423, 426 (Utah 1986). [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 4:10 am
Smith, (1990) (majority opinion)Lee v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Hutchison, Revisiting Employment Division v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 11:36 am
In the case of Smith v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:23 am
The issue is whether the Supreme Court's landmark Free Exercise Clause decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:37 am
EFFECT: This law is a legislative overturning of a California Court of Appeal decision (Rope v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:36 am
Chief Justice Roberts wrote the opinion of the court which was joined by five other justices, avoiding the question of whether to overrule Employment Division v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:00 am
”Employment Division v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, Fort Smith Division, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In mid-February, the agency announced a settlement where in addition to a cash payment of $520,000, the company agreed to modify its employment related policies and practices, and will no longer terminate an individual based solely on their test-related performance.In a written statement, Faye Williams, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Memphis… [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:38 am
Hobby Lobby suit—was a reaction to the “notorious” Employment Division v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:05 am
Smith. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:55 pm
Smith and Eldred v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 7:55 am
In Eplee v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 9:19 am
One of the arguments in the amicus brief I filed on Perich’s behalf concerned the Court’s leading free exercise precedent, Employment Division v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Conservation Comm'n v. [read post]
