Search for: "Smith v. Medtronic, Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 137
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm
Cephalon, Inc., 2010 WL 1257790, at *6 (D.N.J. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
Pa. 2010); Smith v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:22 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 2012 WL 1380265, at *4 (E.D. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Bard, Inc. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
Nash Oil & Gas, Inc., 526 F.3d 626, 631 (10th Cir. 2008) (quoting and applying Phelan); Orr v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008) and “impliedly preempted” — “implied preemption” is a code-phrase conservative judicial activists use when they want to pretend Congress tried to stop state tort lawsuits even when it didn’t — under § 337a of the MDA as interpreted by Buckman v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., 285 F.3d 238, 239 n.2 (3d Cir. 2002) (applying Pennsylvania law) (Bexis’s case); Bogle v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Smith & Nephew Richards Inc., 1996 WL 593780 (Tx. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008). [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:51 am
Medtronic MiniMed, Inc., 2008 WL 1990892 (D.P.R. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Appx. 446 (6th Cir. 2010); Smith v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Brown v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
Alpharma USPD, Inc., 887 So.2d 881, 883 (Ala. 2004)) (emphasis added).That’s four.Finally, in Overton v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
We’re always open to flattery, and it’s flattering to us when somebody thinks that we provide the best legal research available (at least without a prescription). [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
Instruments, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 623 F.3d 1200 (8th Cir. 2010). [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:17 am
Medtronic, Inc., No. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Western Auto Supply Co., 18 P.3d 49, 56-58 (Alaska 2001) (§12); Smith v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
See Smith v. [read post]
