Search for: "Smith v. United States District Court for the Northern District" Results 81 - 100 of 266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2012, 2:02 pm by Lisa Baird
In yet another reminder about the importance of maintaining evidence on company-issued laptops, blackberries, or other electronic devices; the United States District Court for the Northern District of California recently sanctioned a qui tam relator for destroying more than 10,000 documents on his company-issued laptop. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in Northern States Power Company v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
PUBLISHED OPINIONS Opinion Short Title/District 08a0415p.06  Smith v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 pm by Steven Calabresi
Washington, D.C. super-lawyer, Gene Schaerr, has filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 10:03 am
The district court sentenced him to twenty-seven months of imprisonment, the bottom of the range calculated under the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("Guidelines" or "U.S.S.G. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:34 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisOpinion Date: 5/23/11Cite: LKQ Corp. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
We find that the district court properly exercised its discretion to impose a sentence without a presentence report under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(c)(1)(A)(ii) and United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 6A1.1(a)(2). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am by John Elwood
District Court for the Northern District of Texas (relisted after the 11/10 Conference) Docket:  10-1518 Issue(s): Under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by CMS
On 21 January 2021, the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow ordered seizure of the Belgrave Square Property. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
Bodyke, (2008-2502)   Ohio Courts of Appeals First District State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
OFSTEDAHL, ET AL., United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Civil Action No. [read post]