Search for: "Smith v. United States District Court for the Northern District" Results 81 - 100 of 266
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm by Aurora Barnes
Covington 17-1364 Issues: (1) Whether the district court had jurisdiction to consider challenges to the new districting plan the North Carolina General Assembly enacted after North Carolina’s previous state districting plan was invalidated as a racial gerrymander; (2) whether the district court erred by finding that four districts were racially gerrymandered even though the legislature did not consider race; (3)… [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
United States without reaching the central question presented by the cert petition, which involved clarifying the rule of Marks v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
However, it limited the scope of the injunction to foreign nationals with a bona fide relationship to a person or entity in the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
District Court for the District of New Jersey may further complicate matters. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 9:10 am by Rachel Sandler
The case was heard in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, where the presiding judge quickly dubbed the respective parties “Elf On” and “Elf Off. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:54 am by Ben
In Teresa Scassa, University of OttawaIn Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
  Notably, complaints have been filed far away from the traditional “food court” in the Northern District of California. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
  Notably, complaints have been filed far away from the traditional “food court” in the Northern District of California. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Facebook the Northern District of California has accepted that Facebook’s Terms of Service include valid a choice-of-law California law provision. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 5:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
When Smith was handed down, some worried that it upset existing free exercise doctrine dating back to Sherbert v. [read post]