Search for: "So Cal Value Added"
Results 81 - 100
of 568
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2021, 9:42 am
Inc., Case No. 18stcv04283 (Cal. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:42 pm
In other words, Cal/OSHA appears to be trying so hard to address breakthrough cases that they will now be forcing exclusion of vaccinated employees who have tested negative after exposure. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
The late Douglas Altman, who did so much to steer the medical literature toward greater validity, warned that dichotomizing continuous variables was known to cause loss of information, statistical power, and reliability in medical research.[17] In the field of pharmaco-epidemiology, the bias created by dichotomization of a continous variable is harmful from both the perspective of statistical estimation and hypothesis testing.[18] While readers are misled into believing that the study… [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
Missouri’s predominant purpose test, which inquires into whether the predominant purpose of using the famous person’s name or identity is to exploit its commercial value; or whether “the predominant purpose of the product is to make an expressive comment on or about a celebrity. [read post]
11 Dec 2021, 9:34 am
Cal. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 7:53 am
Cal. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
Any supposed "inequality in aesthetic value between [a] pageant and a musical or play," the court held, "is a distinction without a difference," id. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:09 am
Cal.) [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 9:50 am
Intel Corp., 184 Cal. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
And I think it's helpful to gather these rules so as to better understand the options that legislators have chosen with regard to this question, especially when evaluating similar new proposals.[2] This is particularly so given the interest in using public accommodations law as a model for limiting social media platforms' ability to block users based on their speech or political ideology.[3] And it's helpful to see these rules when considering the implications of… [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am
But even if the n-word isn’t unregistrable because it’s scandalous or disparaging, it may still be unregistrable because it already has so much expressive meaning that it’s simply incapable of adding a trademark function. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
State, 281 Cal. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
(emphasis added). [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 6:53 am
An antitrust plaintiff’s failure to do so makes its claims untenable. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 10:20 am
Cal. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:55 am
Cal., 2014) (slip op. at *30). [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 8:55 am
Cal. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 3:18 pm
But the protection afforded to offensive messages does not always embrace offensive speech that is so intrusive that the unwilling audience cannot avoid it. [read post]
