Search for: "Social Security Administration et al" Results 81 - 100 of 382
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
15 Administrability: Information asymmetries between enforcers and market participants can be especially stark in the digital economy. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:02 am by SC Divorce and Disabilty
Tenet Healthsystems of Hilton Head, Inc, et al., Respondents.FACTSGuinan suffered from neck, shoulder, and other pain, and received epidural injections of pain medication in his cervical spine on March 13, 2002, from Dr. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 8:53 am
For additional information contact [www.gallerywatch.com] Subscription needed for online access: 07/07/2008 Memorandum of Understanding Between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (PDF 37.4 KB)Memorandum Announces an Agreement to Increase Information Sharing in Matters Pertaining to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and for Other Purposes07/07/2008 Memorandum to EPA Assistant… [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 11:15 am by FM Librarian
(Refugee Research Online Blog,  Nov. 2018) [text]"The Manus Island Regional Processing Centre: A Legal Taxonomy," European Journal of Migration and Law, vol. 20, no. 4 (2018) [abstract] Mapping Social Cohesion: The Scanlon Foundation Surveys 2018 (Scanlon Foundation et al., Nov. 2018) [access]- "E]ight new immigration questions in this year’s survey provide deeper insight into the perceived value of immigration to the nation, and the potential… [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 12:44 pm by Frederica Saini Fasanotti
The Italians used the old "divide et impera" (divide and conquer) strategy, digging real "furrows of blood"—in the words of British scholar Edward E. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Hirmer, et. al., in the Northern District of Florida in March 2010. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 3:16 pm by Cicely Wilson
The Social Security Administration denied the benefits, finding that the wife had not shown the child was the donor’s “child” as defined by the Social Security Act. [read post]