Search for: "Solano v. Solano"
Results 81 - 100
of 192
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2014, 10:09 am
Solano County Airport Land Use Com. (2007) 41 Cal.4th 372, 381, emph. added.) [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:58 pm
In Vilchis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 6:10 am
Duncan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:55 am
SPRAWLDEF v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:28 pm
SPRAWLDEF et al. v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:21 pm
On April 28, 2014, the California Supreme Court granted the applications and filed briefs of numerous amici curiae (“friends of the court”) in the “CEQA-in-reverse” case, California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:36 am
In City of Pittsburgh v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:52 am
The brief was filed on behalf of Amici Curiae League of California Cities and the Counties of Tulare, Kings, and Solano. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 11:50 am
Solano County ALUC (2007) 41 Cal.4th 372.) [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 3:25 pm
Kleinberg is presiding over The People of California v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 10:13 am
By Matthew Hinks State density bonus law -- one of many California statutes enacted to implement the state's policy of promoting the construction of affordable housing -- has withstood a significant challenge posed by the County of Napa (the "County") in a new California Court of Appeal opinion, Latinos Unidos del Valle de Napa y Solano v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 9:05 am
The case, Solano County v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 2:10 pm
Castro, 374 S.W.3d at 593; Solano, 388 S.W.3d at 348; Texas La Fiesta Auto Sales, LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 2:10 pm
Castro, 374 S.W.3d at 593; Solano, 388 S.W.3d at 348; Texas La Fiesta Auto Sales, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:24 pm
Castro, 374 S.W.3d at 593; Solano, 2012 WL 2409659, at *3; Texas La Fiesta Auto Sales, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:24 pm
Castro, 374 S.W.3d at 593; Solano, 2012 WL 2409659, at *3; Texas La Fiesta Auto Sales, LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 2:40 pm
See Hamilton v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 1:13 pm
The issue of a trustee's right to take 25% of the debtor's interest in principal was recently addressed in Bendon v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:39 pm
In a recent case, Leafty v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 1:13 pm
The case is Parks v. [read post]