Search for: "South Dakota v. North Carolina"
Results 81 - 100
of 262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2020, 4:17 am
Act. 6993, Delaware Chancery Court (Mar. 30, 2012) at 12; Brief of Amici Curiae Attorneys General for the Commonwealths of Kentucky, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania, the States of Arizona, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South… [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm
The following is our testimony to Kansas’ Senate Committee on Assessment and Taxation; and Kansas’ House Committee on Taxation Presenting: Kansas Tax Modernization: A Framework for Stable, Fair, Pro-growth Reform Table of Contents Introduction Corporate Income Tax Individual Income Tax State and Local Sales Tax Property and Related Taxes Other Tax and Revenue Introduction Thank you for inviting us to present today before your committee, and for the openness and hospitality we… [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:45 am
Supreme Court’s Wayfair v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
South Carolina 12/31/18 FTI FTI South Dakota No tax No tax No tax Tennessee Rolling (b) State calculation Texas 1/1/07 No tax Federal gross receipts and sales Utah Rolling FAGI FTI before NOLs and special deds. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 8:00 am
The Supreme Court and the government of South Dakota alike failed Charles Rhines, allowing his execution despite evidence that his jurors sentenced him to death because of their anti-LGBT prejudice. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 5:45 am
South Dakota Supreme Court decision, this year’s Index also looks at how states are applying their sales taxes to remote sellers. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
of Texas at Austin 1.18 $106,598 $90,100 V&erbilt Univ. 1.19 $129,030 $108,800 Univ. of Arkansas 1.19 $61,500 $51,700 Mitchell Hamline Sch. of Law 1.21 $64,429 $53,200 Univ. of California-Los Angeles 1.26 $121,453 $96,600 Univ. of North Dakota 1.26 $61,500 $48,800 Univ. of Kansas 1.27 $66,415 $52,100 Univ. of Kentucky 1.28 $69,860 $54,400 Univ. of Mississippi 1.32 $64,300 $48,700 The Univ. … [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 12:29 pm
Image Source: wikipedia.com Hawaii, New Mexico, North Carolina, Mississippi, South Dakota, and Utah still have homewrecker laws on their books, although the New Mexico Court of Appeals has made it clear that courts in the state disfavor these lawsuits. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 12:29 pm
Image Source: wikipedia.com Hawaii, New Mexico, North Carolina, Mississippi, South Dakota, and Utah still have homewrecker laws on their books, although the New Mexico Court of Appeals has made it clear that courts in the state disfavor these lawsuits. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 6:33 am
Supreme Court addressed the case of North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am
For example, South Carolina uses an assessment ratio of 5 percent for farm machinery and equipment, compared to 10.5 percent for most other TPP. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 6:36 am
§ 1911(a) In 2011, South Dakota DSS was granted full custody of the children. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 8:28 am
” When the Supreme Court agreed to review this case, many observers hoped that the court might use it as an opportunity to address tax jurisdiction and provide guidance to taxpayers and states, especially in the wake of last summer’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:30 am
§ 95-25.12.North Dakota: Employers can't require an employee to forfeit accrued or earned vacation leave upon separation from employment, regardless of the reason. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:13 am
In response to these lawsuits, the North Carolina General Assembly passed Senate File 711. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:27 am
O’Neil concluded by addressing the state’s argument that last year’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
