Search for: "South Street Securities Holdings Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2020, 8:40 am
The allegations, holding, and unique procedural posture of Muransky have been disc [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
The company also failed to conduct inspections at the required frequency Click Here Connecticut Holding Company Faces Fines for PCB Violations. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to seek DJ that its… [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm
Jennifer Agate in the Hold the Front Page Law Column looks at Yahoo7’s recent $300,000 fine for contempt of court, and the position in the UK. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The alleged violations occurred at an oil storage and distribution facility operated by A&I, located at 2806 South Fifth Avenue in Pocatello, Idaho. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Holland 1916, Inc., of 1340 Burlington Street, North Kansas City, Mo., failed to file the disclosure reports with state and federal authorities for the calendar years 2006, 2007 and 2008, according to a consent agreement and final order filed in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:25 pm
The Privacy and Information Security Law Blog reports. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
Here Are the K Street Lobbyists Closest to McCarthy Yahoo News – Karl Evers-Hillstrom (The Hill) | Published: 1/11/2023 U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
All claims against Walmart go through their claims management company known as Claims Management Inc (CMI), which investigates and administers claims for the retailer’s insurer. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
The Neighborhood Association of the Back Bay, Inc. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
The agency called for further reductions in phosphorus pollution specifically in the area south of Lake Okeechobee. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
It is being funded by Make America Great Again Inc., a super PAC that can raise unlimited amounts of money. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
Environmental Protection Agency last month ordered Jay Peak Resort, Inc. in Jay, Vt. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
Environmental Protection Agency last month ordered Jay Peak Resort, Inc. in Jay, Vt. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
Environmental Protection Agency last month ordered Jay Peak Resort, Inc. in Jay, Vt. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Department of Justice and the South Coast Air Quality Management District announced that Lifoam Industries, Inc. will pay $450,000 in fines, claiming the company violated the federal Clean Air Act and state air quality laws at its polystyrene manufacturing facility at 2340 E. 52 Street in Vernon, Calif. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:06 pm
“Those taking actions that impact surface waters and wetlands must secure appropriate permits to protect water resources and the functions they provide. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 7:29 am
Consequently, authorities have proposed the “world’s first government regulation dedicated to ‘algorithm empowered recommendations’ to curb the use of technology, and to hold owners of these algorithms accountable for any content that run contrary to state policies,” The South China Morning Post reported. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
In the NOE, Caltrans asserted that the project was statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 103 and Public Resources Code sections 21080.5(c) and 21080.9. [read post]
