Search for: "Southern Pacific Co. v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The very concept of “debtor-in-possession” suggests a belief in the chance of renewal which is absent from the “receivership style” of insolvency prevalent outside the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Its purpose is to "monitor, investigate, and submit to congress an annual report on the national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic relationship between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, and to provide recommendations, where appropriate, to Congress for legislative and administrative action. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The US experience, as shown by securities class actions such as Owens Corning v National Union Fire Insurance Co [6], indicates that the construction of exclusions is not a simple issue. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
“Maricopa County’s particulate air pollution is a serious problem,” said Deborah Jordan, director of the Air Division in the EPA’s Pacific Southwest office. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The two companies will also pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the United States as well as to Alabama and Louisiana, and $200,000 to Louisiana organ [read post]
(As discussed here, here, and here, the employment status of college athletes remains an open question under two ongoing cases before the NLRB involving the University of Southern California and Dartmouth, respectively.) [read post]
(As discussed here, here, and here, the employment status of college athletes remains an open question under two ongoing cases before the NLRB involving the University of Southern California and Dartmouth, respectively.) [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]