Search for: "Sovereign v. People (1983)" Results 81 - 100 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by John Elwood
§ 1983, alleging that her treatment by the county violated the Americans with Disabilities Act by failing to accommodate her gender dysphoria. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am by Kevin LaCroix
 People carrying out transactions in U.K. markets need to have confidence that they are operating on a level-playing field with everyone else. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Evinger, No. 06-2103 "In a prisoner's suit brought under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 against several correctional officials claiming that they retaliated against plaintiff because he tried to obtain evidence to defend himself against a disciplinary charge, dismissal of the suit is affirmed wh [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
He has been an adjunct professor teaching eminent domain law at the University of Detroit Law School since 1983, and now serves as an adjunct professor at Michigan State University College of Law. ** Darius W. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
Campbell-Ewald poses three questions: (1) whether a case becomes moot when the plaintiff receives an offer of complete relief on his claim; (2) whether a case becomes moot when the plaintiff has asserted a class claim but receives an offer of complete relief before any class is certified; and (3) whether the doctrine of sovereign immunity recognized in Yearsley v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Reyeros, No. 06-1485, 06-1486 Convictions and sentence for conspiracy to import cocaine are affirmed where: 1) there was sufficient evidence that defendant knew the specific object of the conspiracy; 2) documents in the possession of a foreign sovereign and never seen by the government were not subject to Brady or Jencks disclosure; 3) there was no individual or cumulative unfairness in the court's rulings on a motion to sever, evidentiary questions, or alleged prosecutorial… [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
" The benefit to Paul's reputation (and to people who want to know the truth about Paul) is great, and the cost to Donna and her employer is small. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
”[25]  Others have declined to impose sanctions for noncompliance, at least where the recipient is found to be acting in good faith, expressing “considerable discomfort to think that a court of law should order a violation of law, particularly on the territory of the sovereign whose law is in question. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm by John Ross
Please enjoy the latest edition of Short Circuit, a weekly feature written by a bunch of people at the Institute for Justice. [read post]