Search for: "Spells v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2014, 12:17 pm
The case was Holmes v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 1:09 pm
Crane Co., 266 P.3d 987 (Cal. 2012) from the California Supreme Court – and our hope that it spelled the beginning of the end for Conte v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:25 pm
But spell them out she does. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 8:07 pm
Or in any published or unpublished judicial decision in the United States. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:05 pm
As we head into a hot holiday weekend, here are some appellate items to explore:Today's DJ has Justice Moore's piece on Jackie Robinson, United States v. 2LT Jack R Robinson as well as Marc Alexander's book review: Notorious RBG Talks Life, Love, Liberty, and LawThe Recorder's On Appeals column has Katy Graham's The Far-Reaching Effects of a Landmark Decision on the Standard of Appellate Review for Clear and Convincing Evidence.Tuesday's… [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 11:54 am
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court began on Tuesday in Health and Hospital Corp. v Talevski. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
In Keegan v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 12:36 pm
In Barbuto v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
Morgan State University (06-306) and turned aside a petition for rehearing in the denied case of Ray v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 7:08 am
A Michigan court of appeals case caused a stir among the State Bar of Michigan's Family Law Section today. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:20 am
2010-1142 Sorensen v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:35 am
Grits is headed to the capitol this morning for an event celebrating the 50th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 8:24 am
Booker is not a magical incantation which spells the disappearance of congressional enacted mandatories (yet).US v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
Nevertheless, applying Munjaz [2005] UKHL 58 “cogent reasons … spelled out clearly, logically and convincingly” were needed to depart from statutory guidance. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
It was a facial challenge that failed in state courts. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 8:29 am
Alteration of spelling in 16c. is unexplained. [read post]
21 May 2007, 1:56 pm
In Adkins v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:42 am
Even if the analysis is right and the Secretary of State was not obliged to set out where things had got to, there would have been nothing to stop him spelling this out. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
A panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision yesterday in Big Lagoon Rancheria v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:22 am
The theory that brought about this result became an instant icon, of sorts, with the defense bar, and was even noted by Justice Scalia years later in the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
