Search for: "Spies v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 298
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
State, 2007 Tex. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 5:25 am
In Matter of State Division of Human Rights v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 1:50 pm
Exiles are harassed and spied on, as our ongoing case Kidane v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:29 pm
United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:09 pm
" In State of Kansas v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 7:58 am
It thus suggests that journalists “act openly and with the permission of relevant authorities” not because DoD believes they are spies but to help them “avoid being mistaken as spies” (page 175) (emphasis added). [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:19 pm
(Ilya Somin) As co-blogger David Bernstein notes, Fisher v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:22 am
As his recent Legal 500 entry states, Tom is as "smooth as silk, and no doubt he will be one soon. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 11:11 am
Sarah Grant dissected the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Karnoski v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:55 am
The Article III question is now the subject of a potentially landmark case, al Bahlul v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:30 am
The Snowden disclosures have made it clear the Obama administration misled the Supreme Court about key issues in ACLU’s case against NSA spying, Clapper v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:30 pm
” These include the dismantling of terror cells in Portland, Oregon, and Lackawanna, New York, as well as the conviction of several Al Qaeda and Lashkar-e-Taiba affiliates operating in the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am
” At The Trace, Mike Spies and Dan Friedman assert that there is “no fight the National Rifle Association is more eager to wage than the one over who will claim Antonin Scalia’s seat on the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:45 am
., The Cold War: Law, Lawyers, Spies, and Crises (2016). [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Plaintiff-Appellant Anthony Harris ("Harris") filed suit against Defendants-Appellees Amanda Spies Bornhorst ("Spies")1 and Tuscarawas County, Ohio ("Tuscarawas") (collectively, the "defendants"),2 asserting claims under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 2:50 pm
Our lawsuit, Wikimedia v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
The ACLU brought Wikimedia v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:35 am
The Master of the Rolls’ Committee on super injunctions earlier in the year emphasised in its Report its fundamental constitutional status, and stated that the principle “applies to interim injunction applications as it does to trials”. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 8:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
