Search for: "State v. Holland"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,026
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 7:00 am
The rule comes from a decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Holland v Hostopia.com. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 8:39 am
Parker, of Joseph, Hollander & Craft LLC, of Topeka, won in State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 10:09 am
Source: FerroRubini / shutterstock The decision in Nieto v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Black v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Kirk v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 5:42 am
About seven years after Holland’s conviction, following the publication of Watson v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 2:00 am
Unrein v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 8:00 am
Herns v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:00 am
Supreme Court held in the landmark civil rights case Bostock v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:00 am
Supreme Court held in the landmark civil rights case Bostock v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm
We join the officers and directors of the State Bar in expressing our deepest sympathy. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
Pineiro v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 3:43 am
Under these circumstances, the complaint states a valid legal malpractice cause of action (see Arnav Indus., Inc. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
” Davis v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 9:20 am
Yee may have been hampered in his search efforts by COVID-19, the trial judge declined to take this into consideration, relying on the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Holland v Hostopia.com Inc., which states: “Notice is to be determined by the circumstances existing at the time of termination and not by the amount of time that it takes the employee to find employment”. [read post]